Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2014 Feb 8;192(1):200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.028

Table 3.

Unadjusted and adjusted predictors* of use of CT alone in children with suspected urolithiasis

Characteristic Unadjusted Adjusted

Odds Ratio 95% CI p-value Odds Ratio 95% CI p-value

1st (lowest) quartile of pediatric patients (vs. highest quartile) 1.66 (1.23-2.22) <0.0001 1.53 (1.31-1.80) <0.001

Year <0.0001 <0.0001
 2006 (ref)
 2007 1.40 (0.91-2.14) 1.11 (0.87-1.41)
 2008 0.97 (0.67-1.41) 0.77 (0.62-0.95)
 2009 0.63 (0.43-0.93) 0.58 (0.47-0.71)
 2010 0.52 (0.36-0.76) 0.42 (0.34-0.51)

Age Category <0.0001 <0.0001
 Young children (1-4 years) (ref)
 School-aged children (5-12 years) 4.96 (2.95-8.33) 4.32 (2.49-7.48)
 Adolescents (13-17 years) 9.35 (5.53-15.80) 7.62 (4.44-13.09)

Male Gender 1.14 (0.99-1.32) 0.07 1.41 (1.24-1.59) <0.0001

Region <0.0001 <0.0001
 Northeast (ref)
 Midwest 2.67 (1.56-4.57) 2.61 (2.04-3.33)
 South 2.31 (1.78-2.99) 2.03 (1.77-2.32)
 West 1.23 (0.90-1.70) 0.99 (0.81-1.21)

Non-teaching Hospital 2.42 (1.92-3.06) <0.0001 1.97 (1.74-2.24) <0.0001

Weekend Day 1.41 (1.20-1.65) <0.0001 1.36 (1.18-1.56) <0.0001
*

Weighted logistic regression