Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug;9(4):420–427.

Table 1.

Mean differences (with 95% confidence interval) between corresponding 3D and 2D measurements of lateral trunk angle for each of all four LTA techniques

95% Confidence Interval
Dependent Variable Independent Variable Mean Difference Lower Bound Upper Bound p‐value
Initial Contact LTA1 ‐15.2 ‐18.0 ‐12.3 .000
LTA2 ‐4.4 ‐7.2 ‐1.5 .000
LTA3 ‐8.5 ‐11.4 ‐5.7 .000
LTA4 0.1 ‐2.7 3.0 1.000
Max Lateral Angle LTA1 ‐15.3 ‐19.4 ‐11.3 .000
LTA2 ‐3.7 ‐7.8 0.3 .086
LTA3 ‐7.7 ‐11.8 ‐3.7 .000
LTA4 0.1 ‐3.9 4.2 1.000
Max Medial Angle LTA1 ‐0.4 ‐4.7 3.8 .999
LTA2 ‐3.0 ‐7.2 1.2 .284
LTA3 ‐6.7 ‐10.9 ‐2.5 .000
LTA4 1.2 ‐3.0 5.4 .940
Trunk Angle ROM LTA1 ‐14.9 ‐18.1 ‐11.8 .000
LTA2 ‐0.7 ‐3.9 2.4 .969
LTA3 ‐1.1 ‐4.2 2.1 .887
LTA4 ‐1.0 ‐4.2 2.1 .894

LTA= Lateral Trunk Angle

Note: p‐value < 0.05 indicates dependent variable mean is significantly different from 3D measurement mean.