Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug;9(4):476–487.

Table 2.

Effect of Ankle Braces on Muscle Activation Patterns during the Forward Lunge Exercise

Isolated Muscle Activation Distal/Proximal Muscle Activation Total Muscle Activation
Muscles No Brace Mean±SD Brace Mean±SD p‐value ES (95% CI) No Brace Mean±SD Brace Mean±SD p‐value ES (95% CI) No Brace Mean±SD Brace Mean±SD p‐value ES (95% CI)
Anterior Tibialis Pre‐IC 0.57±0.46 0.58±0.46 .87 0.01 (‐0.70, 0.73)
Post‐IC 0.59±0.60 0.60±0.36 .99 0.00 (‐0.71, 0.72)
Peroneus Longus Pre‐IC 0.24±0.14 0.22±0.13 .19 ‐0.19 (‐0.91, 0.53) Pre‐IC 1.21±0.73 1.10±0.70 .12 ‐0.14 (‐0.86, 0.57)
Post‐IC 0.35±0.17 0.30±0.15 .03* ‐0.32(‐1.04, 0.40) Post‐IC 1.29±0.75 1.20±0.52 .39 ‐0.15 (‐0.86, 0.57)
Lateral Gastrocnemius Pre‐IC 0.39±0.35 0.31±0.37 .03* ‐0.23 (‐0.95, 0.49)
Post‐IC 0.35±0.22 0.30±0.22 .23 ‐0.20 (‐0.92, 0.52) Pre‐IC 1.58±0.76 1.47±0.70 .15 ‐0.15 (‐0.87, 0.57)
Rectus Femoris Pre‐IC 0.14±0.09 0.13±0.09 .98 0.00 (‐0.72, 0.71) Post‐IC 1.82±0.87 1.77±0.67 .60 ‐0.06 (‐0.78, 0.65)
Post‐IC 0.24±0.17 0.25±0.14 .39 0.09 (‐0.63, 0.81)
Biceps Femoris Pre‐IC 0.14±0.09 0.12±0.06 .23 ‐0.25 (‐0.97, 0.47) Pre‐IC 0.37±0.16 0.36±0.14 .68 ‐0.05 (‐0.77, 0.67)
Post‐IC 0.13±0.05 0.13±0.05 .58 0.08 (‐0.64, 0.80) Post‐IC 0.53±0.25 0.57±0.26 .16 0.16 (‐0.56, 0.88)
Gluteus Medius Pre‐IC 0.10±0.06 0.11±0.06 .41 0.14 (‐0.58, 0.85)
Post‐IC 0.17±0.10 0.20±0.13 .28 0.22 (‐0.50, 0.93)

p‐values are for paired t‐Test Statistical Results – Level of significance set a priori at p≤0.05,

*

denotes significant difference between brace and no brace conditions.

ES= Cohen's d Effect Sizesand CI= 95% Confidence IntervalsNote: Negative ES indicates decreased muscle activity in braced condition

Positive ES indicates increased muscle activity in braced condition

SD – Standard Deviation

Pre‐IC= Pre‐Initial Contact Root Mean Square area 50ms

Post‐IC= Post‐Initial Contact Root Mean Square area 100ms