Table 1.
Comparison between fine needle aspiration and core biopsy
| FNA | CNB | |
| Ability to distinguish invasive from in situ lesions | No | Yes |
| Accurate for palpable lesions | Yes | Yes |
| Accurate for non palpable lesions | No | Yes |
| Useful for hypocellular and sclerotic lesions | No | Yes |
| Diagnosis of papillary lesions | Low | Moderate |
| Distinction of low grade lesions | Very difficult | Difficult |
| Suitable for difficult or superficial sites | Yes | No |
| Appropriate for patients with coagulation abnormalities | Yes | No |
| Complication rate | Very low | Low |
| Minimal invasiveness | Yes | No |
| Special experience required | Yes | No |
| Rapid (initial) diagnosis | Yes | No |
| Patient discomfort | No | Yes |
| Long tissue processing time | No | Yes |
| Cost | Inexpensive | More expensive than FNA |
| Requirement of anesthesia | No | Yes |
FNA: Fine needle aspiration; CNB: Core biopsy.