Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 10;5(3):359–373. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.359

Table 1.

Comparison between fine needle aspiration and core biopsy

FNA CNB
Ability to distinguish invasive from in situ lesions No Yes
Accurate for palpable lesions Yes Yes
Accurate for non palpable lesions No Yes
Useful for hypocellular and sclerotic lesions No Yes
Diagnosis of papillary lesions Low Moderate
Distinction of low grade lesions Very difficult Difficult
Suitable for difficult or superficial sites Yes No
Appropriate for patients with coagulation abnormalities Yes No
Complication rate Very low Low
Minimal invasiveness Yes No
Special experience required Yes No
Rapid (initial) diagnosis Yes No
Patient discomfort No Yes
Long tissue processing time No Yes
Cost Inexpensive More expensive than FNA
Requirement of anesthesia No Yes

FNA: Fine needle aspiration; CNB: Core biopsy.