Table 1.
FNA | CNB | |
Ability to distinguish invasive from in situ lesions | No | Yes |
Accurate for palpable lesions | Yes | Yes |
Accurate for non palpable lesions | No | Yes |
Useful for hypocellular and sclerotic lesions | No | Yes |
Diagnosis of papillary lesions | Low | Moderate |
Distinction of low grade lesions | Very difficult | Difficult |
Suitable for difficult or superficial sites | Yes | No |
Appropriate for patients with coagulation abnormalities | Yes | No |
Complication rate | Very low | Low |
Minimal invasiveness | Yes | No |
Special experience required | Yes | No |
Rapid (initial) diagnosis | Yes | No |
Patient discomfort | No | Yes |
Long tissue processing time | No | Yes |
Cost | Inexpensive | More expensive than FNA |
Requirement of anesthesia | No | Yes |
FNA: Fine needle aspiration; CNB: Core biopsy.