Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 10;5(3):425–439. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.425

Table 4.

Prospective randomized phase III trials of whole breast radiotherapy vs conventional fractionation radiotherapy

Institution/trial N Median F/U Eligibility criteria Treatment arms Primary endpoint Secondary endpoint
Royal Marsden Hospital/Sutton and Gloucestershire Oncology Centre[90,91] 1410 5 yr1 Invasive breast cancer, T1-3N0-1M0, < 75 yr, BCS (complete macroscopic resection),Level II/III AD 50 Gy in 25 fx 39 Gy in 13 fx 42.9 Gy in 13 fx Late changes in breast appearance Palpable breast induration Ipsilateral tumor recurrence
UK START A[92,94] 2236 9.3 yr Invasive breast cancer, T1-3aN0-1M0, > 18 yr, Clear tm margins (≥ 1 mm), No immediate surgical reconstruction, Available for follow-up 50 Gy in 25 fx 41.6 Gy in 13 fx 39 Gy in 13 fx Loco-regional tumor recurrence Late normal tissue effects QOL
UK START B[93,94] 2215 9.9 yr Invasive breast cancer, T1-3aN0-1M0,> 18 yr, Clear tm margins (≥ 1 mm), No immediate surgical reconstruction, Available for follow-up 50 Gy in 25 fx 40 Gy in 15 fx Loco-regional tumor recurrence Late normal tissue effects QOL
Ontario Clinical Oncology Group[95] 1234 12 yr Invasive breast cancer, BCS + Level I/II AD,Tm ≤ 5 cm, Negative axillary nodes, Maximum width of breast tissue ≤ 25 cm, No multicentric disease 50 Gy in 25 fx 42.5 Gy in 16 fx Local recurrence Regional and distant recurrence Second cancers Breast cosmesis Late toxic effects of radiation
1

Minimum follow-up. N: Number of patients; F/U: Follow-up; WBRT: Whole breast radiotherapy; RT: Radiotherapy; BCS: Breast conserving surgery; AD: Axillary dissection; fx: Fraction; Gy: Gray; UK START; United Kingdom Standardization of Breast Radiotherapy; QOL: Quality of life.