Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomaterials. 2014 Apr 16;35(22):5862–5874. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.048

Table 1.

IMF parameter estimates for the model seen in equation 1a using categorical isoelectric point and density.

Variable βs β Parameter Estimate Standard Error t Value Pr > |t|
Intercept β1 0.923 0.016 59.57 <.0001
Isoelectric High β2 0.172 0.034 5.12 <.0001
Isoelectric Med. β3 0.157 0.032 4.85 <.0001
Isoelectric Low. β4 −0.008 0.049 −0.16 0.8718
Ligand OEG β5 −0.004 0.044 −0.09 0.9245
Ligand Glc β6 0.015 0.048 0.3 0.7622
Ligand Man β7 0.065 0.047 1.41 0.1602
Density High β8 0.381 0.037 10.21 <.0001
Density Med. β9 0.097 0.031 3.12 0.0019
Density Low** β10 0 . . .
Donor* β11–22 −0.594 – 0.660 0.058 −10.21 – 11.35 <.0001
*

All donor estimates, standard errors, t values, and probabilities can be seen in the Error! Reference source not found. in the supplemental.

**

Low density conjugates varied linearly with the control due to no difference between cell response to low density and no ligand groups. Thus, this group had to be removed from the model.