Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 6;4(8):e005593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005593

Table 2.

Characteristics of the patients with regard to the impact of VIT on work

  Impact of VIT on work
Positive
n=44
Negative or indifferent
n=137
p Value
Female, n (%) 12 (27.3) 31 (22.6) NS
Age, mean±SD 49.7±11.7 46.8±10.3 NS
VIT, n (%)
 Ongoing 22 (50) 100 (73) <0.01
 Concluded 22 (50) 37 (27)
Treated with VIT for, n (%)
Apis mellifera 11 (25) 48 (35) NS
Vespula sp. 17 (38.6) 49 (35.8) NS
Polistes sp. 13 (22.7) 31 (22.6) NS
Vespa crabro 6 (13.6) 9 (6.6) NS
Mueller reaction grade, n (%)
 I 7 (15.9) 26 (19) NS
 II 6 (13.6) 28 (20.4)
 III 12 (27.3) 25 (18.2)
 IV 19 (43.2) 58 (42.3)
Ever stung before the reaction, n (%) 38 (86.4) 102 (74.5) NS
Other severe Hymenoptera reactions, n (%) 2 (4.5) 11 (8) NS
Years after the first severe reaction, mean±SD 7.7±5.4 7.3±6.1 NS
Having the severe reaction at work, n (%) 17 (38.6) 23 (16.8) <0.005
Work-related risk of exposure to Hymenoptera, n (%)
 High 28 (63.6) 46 (33.6) <0.01
 Occasionally high 5 (11.4) 35 (25.5)
 Low 11 (25) 56 (40.9)
Self-employed worker, n (%) 20 (45.5) 38 (27.7) <0.05

NS, not significant; VIT, venom immunotherapy.