Table 2.

Participants’s language and non-verbal cognitive diagnostic assessments.

	FL	FS	JPL
MT-86 aphasia battery (Nespoulous et al., 1992)
Expression
Naming/31	17 [28]	8 [28]	17 [23]
Narrative discourse/18	9 [9]	2 [9]	7 [8]
Global reduction of fluency	Moderate	Severe	Moderate
Agrammatism	Severe	Severe	Severe
Syntactic deviations	Moderate	Severe	Moderate
Anomia	Moderate	Severe	Moderate
Phonetic deviations	Moderate	Severe	Moderate
Phonemic deviations (and/or jargon)	Moderate	Severe	Moderate
Semantic deviations	Moderate	Mild	Mild
Repetition/30	16 [24]	9 [24]	12 [27]
Comprehension/47	24 [40]	33 [40]	34 [39]
Words/9	9	8	9
Sentences/38	15	25	25
Verbal fluency test (Cardebat et al., 1990)
Phonemic fluency	2 (−2.6)	8 (−2.2)	8 (−2.2)
Semantic fluency	6 (−3.9)	7 (−3.7)	23 (−2.3)
Abbreviated MBEMA (Peretz et al., 2013)
Pitch/20	15	9 (−4.1)	14
Rhythm/20	17	16	17
Memory/20	15	13 (−3.6)	17
PEGV (Agniel et al., 1992)
Visual agnosia/66	62	62	66
WAIS (Wechsler, 1997a)
Matrix reasoning/26	22	11	23
WMS (Wechsler, 1997b)
Spatial span/32	10	15	17
Tower of London – Drexel University (Culbertson and Zillmer, 2001)
Total move score	7	32	20

When available, the maximum score is indicated next to the test name. Measures considered below the relevant norms for patient’s demographics are printed in bold and number of standard deviations (SD) to the mean is indicated next to the scores in parentheses. Cut-off scores for patients’ age and education are in square brackets. MBEMA, Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Musical Abilities; PEGV, Protocole d’évaluation des gnosies visuelles (Visual agnosia diagnostic battery); WAIS-III, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – third edition; WMS, Wechsler Memory Scale – third edition.