Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Genet. 2013 Oct 11;133(3):265–279. doi: 10.1007/s00439-013-1366-4

Table 3.

Type-I error rates and power estimates under the major parameter settings.

Model
σwp2
σbp2
Type-I error (%) Power (%)

h2=0.2% h2=0.4% h2=0.6% h2=0.8% h2=1%
FE 0 0 5.0 75.2 99.1 99.9 100.0 100.0
0 0.1 23.1 70.2 98.3 99.9 100.0 100.0
0.6 0 27.3 69.0 97.1 99.9 100.0 100.0
0.6 0.1 38.0 22.0 48.9 69.4 83.8 91.7
RE 0 0 3.8 41.5 75.6 89.4 95.7 98.6
0 0.1 17.9 52.9 91.1 98.8 99.7 99.9
0.6 0 8.1 13.4 43.9 71.9 86.5 94.4
0.6 0.1 13.6 1.0 2.0 2.1 2.7 2.9

Note: “FE” and “RE” denote fixed-effects and random-effects models, respectively; σbp2 and σwp2 denote between- and within-population variances, respectively; h2 represents heritability (phenotypic variation explained by the SNP). 10 individual GWA studies, each with 2,000 individuals, were included in the meta-analysis.