Selection |
|
|
|
I needed advice on a specific issue |
2 |
15 |
5.15 (1.12–23.6) |
I wanted general support on career options and decisions |
27 |
65 |
2.97 (1.36–6.5) |
I was impressed by the quality of the mentors available |
7 |
33 |
3.94 (1.58–9.85) |
S/he was recommended to me as being a good mentor |
6 |
30 |
4.04 (1.54–10.61) |
Two or more ‘selection’ statements |
10 |
47 |
5.10 (2.24–11.6) |
Mentee |
|
|
|
Aged 44 years or less at last birthday |
35 |
78 |
7.24 (2.20–23.80) |
Experience |
|
|
|
My mentor… |
|
|
|
served as a role model for me |
25 |
72 |
4.53 (1.58–13.0) |
encouraged me to talk openly about anxieties and fears |
15 |
61 |
6.22 (2.71–14.3) |
used his/her influence to my benefit |
10 |
39 |
4.06 (1.67–9.83) |
suggested specific strategies for achieving my career goals |
30 |
79 |
14.0 (3.82–51.7) |
challenged me to do things to develop new skills |
13 |
59 |
7.66 (3.23–18.1) |
shared personal experiences as an alternative perspective |
18 |
61 |
4.71 (2.11–10.5) |
demonstrated good listening skills |
30 |
76 |
7.09 (2.35–21.4) |
served as a sounding board for me |
19 |
74 |
11.7 (4.33–31.5) |
helped me to find my own solutions |
24 |
76 |
23.8 (5.07–111) |
Being mentored has helped me to … |
|
|
|
achieve a better balance between work and family life |
1 |
18 |
16.4 (2.09–108) |
achieve a better balance between research and clinical duties |
3 |
38 |
14.6 (4.12–51.7) |
develop networking skills |
13 |
51 |
4.22 (1.88–9.50) |
become more independent in my research career |
11 |
61 |
15.5 (6.03–39.9) |
stay in academic medicine |
8 |
57 |
10.5 (4.17–26.5) |
make a greater contribution to my research team |
5 |
57 |
20.3 (6.87–59.8) |
make a greater contribution to my hospital |
2 |
29 |
12.1 (2.69–54.2) |
achieve specific career changes and goals |
4 |
68 |
74.4 (20.9–264) |
have the confidence to apply for promotion |
3 |
46 |
23.3 (6.48–84.0) |
have more confidence in my own abilities |
11 |
64 |
11.3 (4.60–27.5) |
secure more research funding |
1 |
34 |
34.0 (4.43–261) |
publish more academic papers |
3 |
30 |
9.74 (2.73–34.7) |
develop more academic collaborations |
9 |
57 |
10.6 (4.23–26.3) |
Five or more ‘My mentor … ’ and seven or more ‘Being mentored … ’ statements |
21 |
78 |
25.1 (7.90–79.6) |
Relationship |
|
|
|
My mentor and I know and understand each other |
11 |
60 |
5.43 (4.95–29.1) |
My mentor is well-disposed towards me |
28 |
80 |
17.1 (1.98–149) |
My mentor and I set out clear expectations early on |
13 |
60 |
7.53 (3.29–17.2) |
The value I get is not sufficient given the time I put in |
9 |
5 |
0.21 (0.07–0.69) |
I was not able to spend enough time with my mentor |
31 |
15 |
0.09 (0.04–0.22) |
Three or more ‘relationship’ statements |
17 |
74 |
16.9 (6.59–43.1) |
Logistics |
|
|
|
My typical mentoring session lasts 1–2 h |
14/41 |
41/78 |
2.40 (1.09–5.29) |
Initial contact is shared between us |
5/43 |
26/81 |
3.63 (1.28–10.3) |
I have contact with my mentor at least once per year |
25 |
77 |
14.2 (4.87–41.2) |
Two or more ‘logistics’ statements |
9 |
52 |
7.51 (3.20–17.6) |