Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014 Jun 24;44:201–206. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.06.017

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Models Predicting Permanency

Model 1
Model 2
b (se) OR 95% CI b (se) OR 95% CI
PFR condition .54 (.44) 1.72 [ .73 – 4.04] .26 (.48) 1.30 [ .51 – 3.31]
Foster/Kin −3.05 (.45) .05*** [ .02 – .11] −3.20 (.47) .04*** [ .02 − .10]
Age of child months .05 (.05) 1.05 [ .96 – 1.14] .06 (.05) 1.06 [ .97 – 1.16]
Months in child welfare .06 (.04) 1.06 [ .99 – 1.14] .07+ (.04) 1.07 [ .99 – 1.16]
Number of prior placements .09 (.16) 1.10 [ .81 – 1.48] .06 (.16) 1.06 [ .78 – 1.45]
Multiple removals −1.47 (.78) .23+ [ .05 – 1.07] −1.29 (.76) .28+ [ .06 – 1.23]
Commitment .81 (.35) 2.24* [1.14 – 4.43] .76 (.35) 2.13* [1.09 – 4.19]
PFR by Foster/Kim --- --- 2.27 (.94) 9.67* [1.54 – 60.68]
Constant −5.20 ** (1.78) −5.25** (1.78)

Note: OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval;

+

p < .10;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001