Table 1. Comparison of various energy values and docking features for each of the best of modelled complex of Pi54 orthologues and AVR-Pi54 using ZDOCKER in DS3.5.
Name | Forcefield | Potential Energy(kcal/mol) | Van der WaalsEnergy (kcal/mol) | Electrostatic Energy(kcal/mol) | TotalEnergy | Binding energy withAVR-PI54 (kcal/mol) |
Pi54 | CHARMm | −22362.03 | −2303.26 | −23069.97 | −47735.26 | −2265.89 |
Pi54rh | CHARMm | −22904.48 | −2426.16 | −23654.45 | −48985.13 | −1883.53 |
Pi54of | CHARMm | −23888.54 | −2579.13 | −24675.68 | −51143.35 | −1942.56 |
AVR-Pi54 | CHARMm | −7388.96 | −778.53 | −7751.92 | −15919.42 | – |
Binding energy = energy of complex − [energy (receptor) + energy (ligand)].