Table 2. Patterns of habitat selection by red-necked nightjars.
Individual | Area | Selected nestinghabitat | Selected roostinghabitat | Selected foraginghabitat | Avoided foraginghabitat | Model P- value |
270 | Managed | Open shrublands | Pinewood patches | Roads | Pinewood patches | 0.056 |
538 | Managed | Open shrublands | Pinewood patches | Roads | Pinewood patches, open shrublands | <0.001 |
621 | Managed | Open shrublands | Pinewood patches | Roads | Open shrublands | 0.026 |
705 | Managed | Open shrublands | Pinewood patches | Roads, orange tree crops | Pinewood patches | 0.002 |
798 | Managed | Open shrublands | Pinewood patches | Roads | Pinewood patches, open shrublands | 0.001 |
894 | Managed | Open shrublands | Pinewood patches | Orange tree crops | None | 0.526 |
342 | Natural | Open shrublands | Pinewood patches | Roads | Open shrublands | 0.012 |
734 | Natural | Open shrublands | Pinewood patches | Roads, sandy paths | None | 0.115 |
933 | Natural | Open shrublands | Pinewood patches | Roads | Open shrublands, other sites | <0.001 |
981 | Natural | Open shrublands | Pinewood patches | Roads | None | 0.022 |
Nesting, roosting and foraging habitats of radio-tagged individuals breeding in the managed and the natural area are shown. Directionality of selection is summarized from Table S1.