Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol. 2014 Feb 11;67(3):432–438. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.039

Table 2.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes among men who underwent radical prostatectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy

Total RALP RRP p value
Nerve-sparing 0.39*
 Bilateral 69.0 70.7 68.3
 Unilateral 14.9 15.1 14.8
 None 16.1 14.2 16.9

Seminal vesicle removal 0.34
 Yes 96.3 95.2 96.7
 No 3.7 4.8 3.3

Lymph node dissection, % <0.0001
 Yes 75.1 51.5 85.4

Length of hospital stay, d
 Mean 2.6 1.8 2.9 <0.0001
 Median 2.0 1.0 3.0 <0.0001

Estimated blood loss, ml
 Mean 654.3 207.4 852.3 <0.0001
 Median 500.0 150.0 700.0 <0.0001

Transfusions, % <0.0001
 Yes 24.5 4.3 30.3

Transfusion, units, no. 0.16
 Mean 2.0 2.7 2.0

Prostate weight, g 0.94
 Mean 53.6 55.8 52.6

RALP = robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; RRP = radical retropubic prostatectomy.

*

Any type of nerve sparing versus none.

**

Adjusted for year of surgery (2000–2010).