[Table/Fig-7]:

Comparison between secondary tracts as visualised on T2W TSE fat saturated and post contrast T1W TSE fat saturated sequences

(A) T2W TSE FS
				SURGERY(+)			SURGERY(-)
MRI(+)				15			2
MRI(-)				1			32
True Posi-tive	False Posi-tive	True Neg-ative	False Neg-ative	n	Sensi-tivity (%)	Speci-ficity (%)	Positive Predictive Value (%)	Negative Predictive Value (%)	Accuracy (%)
15	2	32	1	50	93.75	94.12	88.24	96.97	94.00
(B) POST CONTRAST T1W TSE FS
				SURGERY(+)			SURGERY(-)
MRI(+)				13			2
MRI(-)				3			32
True Posi-tive	False Posi-tive	True Neg-ative	False Neg-ative	n	Sensi-tivity (%)	Speci-ficity (%)	Positive Predictive Value (%)	Negative Predictive Value (%)	Accuracy (%)
13	2	32	3	50	81.25	94.12	86.67	91.43	90.00

Comparing Accuracy of T2W TSE FS and POST CONTRAST T1W TSE FS: x2 = 1.087; df = 1; p = 0.297; not significant

MRI - Magnetic Resonance Imaging, T1W -T1 weighted, T2W - T2 weighted, FS - Fat Saturated, TSE- Turbo Spin Echo