Table 5.
Age-standardized disability prevalence by residential mobility status, selected local areas, 2000
| Men | Women | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area Type/Area | Stayers | Movers Out | Movers In | Stayers | Movers Out | Movers In |
| Blacks | ||||||
| High-poverty urban | ||||||
| Harlem | 30 | 24* | 26 | 32 | 30 | 27 |
| East Detroit | 34 | 26*** | 30 | 32 | 32 | 29 |
| Southside Chicago | 27 | 27 | 23 | 29 | 24* | 19*** |
| Watts | 31 | 28 | 33 | 31 | 28† | 32 |
| High-poverty rural | ||||||
| East North Carolina | 30 | 26 | 24† | 28 | 24 | 24 |
| Black Belt Alabama | 32 | 24† | 25† | 31 | 35 | 33 |
| Delta Louisiana | 28 | 26 | 21† | 26 | 22 | 22 |
| Nonpoor urban | ||||||
| Bronx | 24 | 26 | 22 | 21 | 17 | 23 |
| Queens | 21 | 18 | 20 | 19 | 21 | 19 |
| Northwest Detroit | 26 | 23* | 25 | 26 | 20*** | 29* |
| Southwest Chicago | 26 | 19*** | 22 | 23 | 22 | 24 |
| Crenshaw/Baldwin Hills | 24 | 22 | 21 | 22 | 25 | 24 |
| Whites | ||||||
| High-poverty urban | ||||||
| Cleveland | 25 | 23 | 20* | 23 | 23 | 24 |
| Detroit | 30 | 21*** | 21* | 27 | 18*** | 30 |
| High-poverty rural | ||||||
| Appalachian Kentucky | 38 | 34 | 32 | 30 | 28 | 35 |
| West North Carolina | 22 | 16* | 17*** | 19 | 15* | 16* |
| Northeast Alabama | 22 | 23 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| South Central Louisiana | 25 | 25 | 21 | 19 | 17 | 17 |
| Nonpoor urban | ||||||
| Western Cleveland | 11 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 12 |
| Sterling Heights, MI | 13 | 10* | 12 | 12 | 9* | 13 |
Note: Asterisks below refer to statistically significant differences between the rates for movers rate and stayers.
†
p < .10;
*
p < .05;
**
p < .01;
***
p < .001