Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Demography. 2014 Jun;51(3):777–809. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0299-4

Table 6.

Percentage high school graduates (age-standardized) by residential mobility status, selected local areas, 2000

Men (%) Women (%)

Area Type/Area Stayers Movers Out Movers In Stayers Movers Out Movers In
Blacks
  High-poverty urban
    Harlem 64 72* 74* 70 75* 74
    East Detroit 60 70*** 69*** 67 73*** 74***
    Southside Chicago 70 72 80*** 74 75 85***
    Watts 65 73*** 68 68 73* 71
  High-poverty rural
    East North Carolina 61 72*** 64 68 76* 76*
    Black Belt Alabama 61 73* 68 68 68 75*
    Delta Louisiana 54 74*** 69*** 63 77*** 71*
  Nonpoor urban
    Bronx 77 83 81 83 86 80
    Queens 79 83 79 86 87 87
    Northwest Detroit 75 78 78 82 85* 79
    Southwest Chicago 72 73 73 79 82* 80
    Crenshaw/Baldwin Hills 77 81 81 82 81 80
Whites
  High-poverty urban
    Cleveland 67 76*** 81*** 71 77* 84***
    Detroit 63 75 81*** 68 79*** 82***
  High-poverty rural
    Appalachian Kentucky 56 71*** 64* 66 72* 59
    West North Carolina 71 83*** 85*** 77 83* 89***
    Northeast Alabama 68 81*** 77*** 73 81*** 79*
    South Central Louisiana 67 80*** 80*** 73 85*** 78
  Nonpoor urban
    Western Cleveland 88 88 89 89 91* 91
    Sterling Heights, MI 87 89 84 88 90 88

Note: Significance indicators below refer to statistically significant differences between the rates for movers rate and stayers.

p < .10;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001