Table 5.
Service Availability in MCH/FP Unit (out of 5) | Service Availability in Facility (out of 8) | Human Resources Integration (out of 5) | Physical Resources Integration (out of 5) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Baseline |
Endline |
Baseline |
Endline |
Baseline |
Endline |
Baseline |
Endline |
Country |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenya (n = 30) |
2.23 |
2.3 |
6.1 |
6.56 |
1.88 |
1.93 |
1.28 |
1.29 |
Swaziland (n = 10) |
2.2 |
2.3 |
6.7 |
7 |
1.36 |
1.01 |
1.15 |
1.18 |
HR integration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More integrated (top 20%) |
2.69b |
3.11c |
6.38 |
7.11b |
2.62d |
2.88d |
1.58 |
1.09b |
Less integrated (bottom 80%) |
2 |
2.06 |
6.19 |
6.52 |
1.33 |
1.34 |
1.10 |
1.86 |
Change in HR integration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most changed (top 20%) |
1.75 |
2.50 |
6.00 |
7.00 |
1.17 |
2.01a |
0.67 |
1.36a |
Least changed (bottom 80%) |
2.34 |
2.25 |
6.31 |
6.56 |
1.90 |
1.61 |
1.40 |
1.24 |
Facility type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital (n = 2) |
3 |
3 |
8 |
8 |
2.77 |
1.79 |
0.98 |
0.59 |
District Hospital (n = 5) |
2.2 |
2.4 |
7.8 |
7.82 |
1.94 |
2.34 |
1.37 |
0.9 |
Sub-District Hospital (n = 6) |
2 |
1.84 |
6.33 |
6.36 |
2 |
1.75 |
1.16 |
1.03 |
Health Centre (n = 17) |
1.41 |
1.52 |
5.35 |
6.18a |
1.15 |
1.21 |
0.71 |
0.95a |
Public Health Unit (n = 2) |
2.5 |
3 |
5.5 |
6.5 |
0.77 |
0.35a |
0.88 |
0.8 |
SRH Clinic (n = 8) |
3.87 |
3.87 |
6.87 |
6.87 |
2.72 |
2.54 |
2.58 |
2.6 |
Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rural (n = 23) |
1.57 |
1.61 |
5.61 |
6.24a |
1.37 |
1.35 |
0.83 |
0.97 |
Urban (n = 17) |
3.11 |
3.23 |
7.12 |
7.24 |
2.26 |
2.13 |
1.83 |
1.64 |
Ownership type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private (n = 8) |
3.87 |
3.87 |
6.87 |
6.87 |
2.72 |
2.54 |
2.58 |
2.6 |
Public (n = 32) | 1.81 | 1.91 | 6.09 | 6.63 | 1.51 | 1.47 | 0.92 | 0.92 |
adifference from baseline significant at the P < 0.10 level.
bdifference from 'less integrated' group significant at the P < 0.10 level.
cdifference from 'less integrated' group significant at the P < 0.05 level.
ddifference from 'less integrated' group significant at the P < 0.00 level.