Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 8;11:63. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-63

Table 3.

Multivariate multinomial logistic regression of factors associated with mistimed and unwanted pregnancies among women in three districts of Tanzania, 2011 (n = 2,054)

 
Mistimed pregnancy
Unwanted pregnancy
Variable RRR 95%Confidence Interval (CI) RRR 95%Confidence Interval (CI)
Age (years)
 
 
 
 
 <20 (ref)
1.00

1.00

 20–34
0.53**
0.35–0.83
0.63
0.34–1.17
 >34
0.35***
0.22–0.57
0.60
0.31–1.18
Marital status
 
 
 
 
 Married (ref)
1.00

1.00

 Ever married
0.93
0.66–1.32
1.14
0.72–1.81
 Single
2.24***
1.58–3.17
4.63***
2.99–7.15
Gravidity
 
 
 
 
 1 (ref)
1.00

1.00

 2–4
1.18
0.85–1.64
0.98
0.62–1.57
 >4
1.76**
1.19–2.61
2.65***
1.54–4.54
Religion
 
 
 
 
 Christian (ref)
1.00

1.00

 Muslim
0.85
0.68–1.06
0.71**
0.52–0.97
 Traditional/other
0.44**
0.20–0.97
0.51
0.14–1.84
District
 
 
 
 
 Kilombero (ref)
1.00

1.00

 Rufiji
0.96
0.70–1.31
0.78
0.51–1.20
 Ulanga
1.15
0.85–1.55
0.42**
0.24–0.72
Contraceptive use
 
 
 
 
 Not using (ref)
1.00

1.00

 Ever used
1.11
0.87–1.42
0.81
0.58–1.15
 Currently using
0.93
0.70–1.22
1.00
0.70–1.41
Inter–partner discussion about family planning
 
 
 
 
 Yes (ref)
1.00

1.00

 No
1.49***
1.20–1.84
1.48**
1.10–1.99
Education
 
 
 
 
 Never been to school (ref)
1.00

1.00

 Primary
1.14
0.87–1.49
0.83
0.58–1.18
 Secondary/higher
1.24
0.76–2.03
0.70
0.35–1.42
Socio-economic status
 
 
 
 
 Poor (ref)
1.00

1.00

 Middle
0.88
0.68–1.14
0.92
0.64–1.32
 Rich
0.85
0.64–1.13
1.02
0.69–1.49
Type of residence
 
 
 
 
 Rural (ref)
1.00

1.00

 Urban 1.09 0.83–1.45 0.77 0.54–1.09

***P < 0.001, **P < 0.05, RRR = Relative risk ratio; CI = Confidence interval; (ref) = Reference category.