Table 3.
Copulation latency | Copulation duration | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Coefficient | t value | P-value | Coefficient | t value | P-value |
Drosophila yakuba | −8.009 × 10−4 | −0.537 | 0.592 | 3.25 × 10−4 | 0.144 | 0.885 |
Drosophila santomea | 4.746 × 10−4 | 0.381 | 0.704 | −4.875 × 10−4 | −0.318 | 0.751 |
Drosophila simulans | 2.142 × 10−3 | 1.30 | 0.196 | −1.289 × 10−3 | −0.734 | 0.464 |
Drosophila sechellia | 9.093 × 10−4 | 0.758 | 0.449 | −1.776 × 10−3 | −1.201 | 0.232 |
No heterogeneity was detected in any of the four species at the two mating behaviors. I found no significant values (P < 0.05, df = 1496).