Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 3;14:784. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-784

Table 1.

District-level intended Avahan coverage and intervention in Maharashtra for high-risk men who have sex with men and transgendered persons (HR-MSM/TG)

Districts District population1(thousands) Estimated size of HR-MSM/TG in districts2 Avahan intended coverage3 History/type of intervention coverage* IBBA samplea
Round 1 Round 2
Ahmednagar 4,088 534 100% First and solo
Beed 2,161 791 84% First and solo
Jalgaon 3,679 594 100% First and solo
Kolhapur 3,515 596 100% First and solo
Latur 2,080 256 48% First and solo
Mumbai 13,830 14,266 21% Not first and minor 400+ 373+
Thane 8,131 800 12% No Avahan intervention
Nandurbar 1,309 41 100% First and solo
Nashik 4,993 172 100% First and solo
Parbhani 1,527 202 100% First and solo
Pune 9,924 3,200 100% Not first but solo 253 279
Sangli 2,583 400 54% Not first but solo
Satara 2,796 185 37% First and solo
Solapur 3,849 1,001 50% Not first and only clinical services
Yavatmal 2,460 204 100% First and solo

Sources: 1) Census 2001; 2) District mapping data; 3) Avahan’s computerized monitoring and information system (CMIS) 2009.

*First and solo: 1) Prior to Avahan (i.e., 2003), when there was no intervention for MSM/TG; 2) Avahan was the only intervention in the district.

Not first but major: Prior to Avahan (i.e., 2003), when MSM interventions existed; currently Avahan covers more than 50% of the mapped HR-MSM/TG population in the district.

Not first but equal: Prior to Avahan (i.e., 2003), when MSM interventions existed; currently Avahan covers 30–50% of the mapped MSM population in the district.

Not first and only clinical services: Prior to Avahan (i.e., 2003), when MSM interventions existed; Avahan provides only clinical services in the district.

+Mumbai and Thane were together considered one domain for sampling.

aIBBA: Integrated behavioral and biological assessment.