Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 21;2014:135049. doi: 10.1155/2014/135049

Table 1.

Patient characteristics and treatment protocols.

Study n Age Episode duration (mo) Treatment protocol Diagnosis
rTMS ECT rTMS ECT rTMS ECT
Keshtkar 2011 [31] 73 34.0 35.6 n.a. n.a. MS: 10
MT: 90%
TP: 4080
MS: 10
BL: 100%
UP
Hansen et al. 2011 [27] 60 46.0 52.0 6.0 4.0 MS: 15
MT: 110%
TP: 1800
MS: 9
UL: 100%
UP + BP
Eranti 2007 [32] 46 63.6 68.3 7.1 5.6 MS: 15
MT: 110%
TP: 15000
MS: 6.3
UL: 18%
BL: 82%
UP
Rosa et al. 2006 [29] 42 41.8 46.0 110.7 103.6 MS: 20
MT: 100%
TP: 50000
MS: 12
UL: 100%
UP
Schulze-Rauschenbach et al. 2005 [33] 30 47.7 46.7 n.a. n.a. MS: 10.8
MT: 100%
TP: 20000
MS: 9.9
UL: 100%
UP
O'Connor et al. 2003 [20] 28 51.2 48.4 n.a. n.a. MS: 10
MT: 90%
TP: 16000
MS: 6–12
UL: 100%
n.a.
Grunhaus et al. 2003 [34] 40 57.6 61.4 16.6 10.4 MS: 20
MT: 90%
TP: 24000
MS: 10
UL: 65%
BL: 35%
UP
Janicak et al. 2002 [26] 25 42.9 42.7 5.5 3.1 MS: 20
MT: 110%
TP: 20000
MS: 12
BL: 100%
UP + BP
Grunhaus et al. 2000 [28] 40 58.4 63.6 8.3 6.9 MS: 20
MT: 90%.
TP: 8000–24000
MS: 9.6
UL: 60%
BL: 40%
n.a.

Notes

n = number of participants; n.a. = data not available; UP = unipolar depression; BP = bipolar depression; MS = mean number of sessions; MT = motor threshold; TP = total pulses; UL = unilateral ECT; BL = bilateral ECT.