Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 14.
Published in final edited form as: Support Care Cancer. 2008 Nov 13;17(5):563–572. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0528-8

Table 2.

Prevalence of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting

Prevalence of treatment failures Number (%) P valuea P valueb

Placebo group (n=46) Ginger 1.0 g group (n=43) Ginger 2.0 g group (n=40)
Nausea
 Acute
  No apripetant 23 (50.0) 21 (48.8) 20 (50.0) 0.76 0.86
  Yes apripetant 8 (17.4) 12 (27.9) 10 (25.0)
 Delayed
  No apripetant 23 (50.0) 26 (60.5) 17 (42.5) 0.15 0.16
  Yes apripetant 8 (17.4) 11 (25.6) 10 (25.0)
Vomiting
 Acute
  No apripetant 11 (23.9) 14 (26.4) 11 (27.5) 0.35 0.47
  Yes apripetant 3 (6.5) 5 (11.6) 6 (15.0)
 Delayed
  No apripetant 8 (52.6) 14 (32.6) 7 (17.5) 0.35 0.07
  Yes apripetant 1 (2.2) 5 (11.6) 5 (12.5)
a

P values were calculated using Cochran Mantel-Haenszel tests stratified by apripetant (yes or no)

b

P values are Pearson chi-squares calculated using logistic regression adjusting for emetic risk of the chemotherapeutic agent (high, moderate, low), apripetant, presence or absence of baseline nausea or vomiting (yes or no) as appropriate for delayed values and presence or absence of acute nausea or vomiting (yes or no) as appropriate for acute measures