Table 2.

Results (rate of false positive findings) of Eklund et al. (2012) using a block-based design with activity and rest periods of 30 s each.

Variant	Smoothing (mm)	FWE	Stratified according to TR
			FWE TR = 1 s	FWE TR = 2 s	FWE TR = 3 s
A	4	0.438	0.722	0.439	0.182
	6	0.375	0.629	0.377	0.147
	8	0.343	0.557	0.348	0.136
	10	0.342	0.546	0.334	0.147
	12	0.321	0.474	0.314	0.141
	14	0.311	0.443	0.303	0.136
	16	0.294	0.464	0.290	0.106
B	4	0.375	0.670	0.381	0.192
	6	0.315	0.577	0.318	0.150
	8	0.274	0.536	0.271	0.122
	10	0.257	0.505	0.258	0.126
	12	0.248	0.485	0.251	0.108
	14	0.240	0.454	0.243	0.112
	16	0.215	0.412	0.227	0.084
	8 (Permutation)	0.075	0.124	0.089	0.056
95% CI		[0.039; 0.061]	[0.007; 0.093]	[0.035; 0.065]	[0.021; 0.079]
Number of datasets		n = 1482	n = 97	n = 796	n = 214

Data were spatially smoothed. A: including global normalization and motion regressors, B: excluding global normalization and motion regressors. The table summarizes the supplementary material from their paper presented at http://people.imt.liu.se/andek/rest_fMRI/ (accessed on 24.04.2013).