Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 24;2014:419853. doi: 10.1155/2014/419853

Table 1.

Demographic data.

Pleural effusions Number of patients Male (%) Female (%) Age, median (IQR)
Benign 93 63 (68) 30 (32) 68 (54–80)
Malignant 74 23 (31) 51 (69) 68 (62–78)
 Lung cancer 43 14 (33) 29 (67) 70 (62–79)
 Breast cancer 8 1 (12) 7 (88) 64 (47–80)
 Ovarian and fallopian cancers 5 0 (0) 5 (100) 70 (66–78)
 Other malignancies 8 3 (37) 5 (63) 65 (63–77)
 Cancer of unknown primary 10 5 (50) 5 (50) 68 (52–80)
Malignant mesothelioma 89 79 (89) 10 (11) 70 (63–78)

Sera Number of patients Male (%) Female (%) Age, median (IQR)

Benign 66 52 (79) 14 (21) 59 (48–71)
 Benign asbestos pleuritis 24 23 (96) 1 (4) 62 (54–73)
Malignant 74 44 (59) 30 (41) 61 (54–69)
 Lung cancer 44 34 (77) 10 (23) 63 (57–70)
 Breast cancer 9 1 (11) 8 (89) 56 (48–71)
 Ovarian and fallopian cancers 3 0 (0) 3 (100) 57 (45–64)
 Other malignancies 16 9 (56) 7 (44) 62 (52–72)
 Cancer of unknown primary 2 1 (50) 1 (50) 56 (50–61)
Malignant mesothelioma 91 34 (37) 57 (63) 65 (56–69)
 Epithelioid 62 23 (37) 39 (63) 65 (54–71)
 Biphasic 13 4 (31) 9 (69) 57 (55–69)
 Sarcomatoid 10 8 (80) 2 (20) 63 (61–65)
 Undetermined 6 2 (33) 4 (66) 64 (55–70)

Age (IQR: interquartile range) and patient subgrouping in the two analysed materials. The high proportion of female mesothelioma patients in the serum material is most likely due to environmental asbestos and erionite exposure, which relates to geographical distribution and has also been reported by others [36].