Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 14.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2012 Nov 28;51(49):9826–9835. doi: 10.1021/bi301256s

Table 1.

Structural statistics for μ-KIIIA[C1-C15,C2-C9,C4-C16] and μ-KIIIA[C1-C9,C2-C15,C4-C16]

μ-KIIIA[C1-C15,C2-C9,C4-C16] μ-KIIIA[C1-C9,C2-C15,C4-C16]e
Distance restraints 231 225
 Intra (i = j) 97 97
 Sequential (| ij | =1) 70 70
 Short (l < | ij | < 6 ) 45 45
 Long 19 13
Dihedral restraints 8 8
Energies (kcal mol−1)a
 ENOE 1.7 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.3
Deviations from ideal geometryb
 Bonds (Å) 0.0015 ± 0.0001 0.0017 ± 0.0002
 Angles (°) 0.503 ± 0.005 0.503 ± 0.013
 Impropers (°) 0.379 ± 0.009 0.371 ± 0.009
Mean global RMSD (Å)c
Backbone heavy atoms 0.51 ± 0.12 0.58 ± 0.11
All heavy atoms 1.39 ± 0.26 1.42 ± 0.28

Ramachandran plotd
 Most favoured (%) 81.1 78.9
 Allowed (%) 18.9 21.1
 Additionally allowed (%) 0 0
 Disallowed (%) 0 0
a

The values for ENOE are calculated from a square well potential with force constants of 50 kcal mol−1 Å2.

b

The values for the bonds, angles, and impropers show the deviations from ideal values based on perfect stereochemistry.

c

The pairwise RMSD over the indicated residues calculated in MOLMOL.

d

As determined by the program PROCHECK-NMR for all residues except Gly and Pro.

e

Structural statistics for μ-KIIIA[C1-C9,C2-C15,C4-C16] from previously published data22 for comparison