Skip to main content
. 2014 May;85(5):811–829. doi: 10.1124/mol.114.091587

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

3H-cAMP accumulation in response to CGP12177 (A, C, and E) and pindolol (B, D, and F) in transiently transfected cells expressing β1-WT (A and B), β1-TM4 (C and D), and β2-WT (E and F). The CGP12177 responses were examined in the absence and presence of 3, 10, and 30 nM cimaterol (A and C); and 0.3, 1, and 3 nM cimaterol (E). Bars represent basal 3H-cAMP accumulation, that in response to 10 µM isoprenaline or that in response to 0.3–30 nM cimaterol alone. Data points are mean ± S.E.M. of triplicate determinations. These single experiments are representative of (A) six, (B) eight, (C) four, (D) three, (E) four, and (F) four separate experiments. This figure examines different evidence for the absence or presence of the secondary conformation. At β1-WT, low concentrations of CGP12177 (e.g., 3 nM, −8.5) inhibit the response to cimaterol, whereas higher concentrations of CGP12177 cause a stimulatory response (e.g., 100 nM, −7 and above). This creates a “dip” in the curve (CGP12177 + fixed concentration of cimaterol) and is strongly suggestive of interaction at two different conformations. This is absent at β1-TM4 and β2-WT, suggesting single-conformation interaction. Similarly, the response to pindolol is biphasic at β1-WT but monophasic at β1-TM4 and β2-WT, again suggesting two conformations at β1-WT but only one conformation at β1-TM4 and β2-WT.