TABLE 2.
Log EC50 values and % maximum response to isoprenaline for CRE-SPAP production for the agonists cimaterol and CGP12177 at the human β1-WT and chimeric β1/β2-adrenoceptors
Mutations in the β1-WT mean that each TM region in turn is mutated to that of the β2-WT (see Table 1). Log KB values for several antagonists for inhibition of the cimaterol and CGP12177 responses were determined. These data were obtained from stable cell lines, and n in the table refers to the number of separate experiments. The table shows that the most consistent and highly significant difference between the β1-WT receptor and all of the TM-swap mutants is that obtained from β1-TM4 when CGP12177 is the agonist. As CGP12177 agonist responses occur at the secondary low-affinity conformation of the β1-WT receptor, this suggests that the β1-TM4 receptor mutations alter this conformation in some way.
Cimaterol Log EC50 | % Isoprenaline | n | Log KB CGP20712A | n | Log KB Bisoprolol | n | Log KB ICI118551 | n | Log KB Propranolol | n | Log KB Carvedilol | n | Log KB CGP12177 | n | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cimaterol as agonist: β1 stable cell lines | |||||||||||||||
β1-WT | −8.25 ± 0.14 | 95.8 ± 2.9 | 8 | −9.18 ± 0.07 | 4 | −8.48 ± 0.17 | 5 | −6.96 ± 0.04 | 5 | −8.52 ± 0.08 | 12 | −9.89 ± 0.13 | 5 | −9.55 ± 0.12 | 8 |
β1-TM1 | −7.91 ± 0.05* | 96.5 ± 3.3 | 11 | −9.35 ± 0.10 | 9 | −8.65 ± 0.12 | 5 | −6.96 ± 0.05 | 9 | −8.66 ± 0.07 | 16 | −9.88 ± 0.08 | 5 | −9.77 ± 0.07 | 15 |
β1-TM2 | −8.19 ± 0.03 | 98.9 ± 3.0 | 15 | −8.78 ± 0.12 | 8 | −8.15 ± 0.07 | 7 | −7.47 ± 0.03* | 14 | −8.52 ± 0.03 | 24 | −9.53 ± 0.18 | 8 | −9.90 ± 0.09 | 17 |
β1-TM3 | −8.82 ± 0.03* | 102.4 ± 2.5 | 9 | −9.34 ± 0.12 | 9 | −8.43 ± 0.07 | 4 | −7.31 ± 0.04* | 10 | −8.53 ± 0.06 | 15 | −9.92 ± 0.16 | 5 | −9.49 ± 0.06 | 13 |
β1-TM4 | −8.15 ± 0.02 | 99.2 ± 1.8 | 10 | −9.50 ± 0.13 | 11 | −8.81 ± 0.04 | 5 | −8.07 ± 0.06* | 9 | −8.99 ± 0.04* | 15 | −9.81 ± 0.12 | 6 | −9.63 ± 0.08 | 17 |
β1-TM5 | −8.48 ± 0.05 | 103.0 ± 1.7 | 9 | −9.09 ± 0.04 | 11 | −7.91 ± 0.03 | 5 | −7.01 ± 0.06 | 11 | −8.71 ± 0.04 | 17 | −9.96 ± 0.09 | 6 | −9.68 ± 0.09 | 17 |
β1-TM6 | −8.59 ± 0.03* | 103.2 ± 2.2 | 10 | −8.52 ± 0.07 | 8 | −8.10 ± 0.15 | 5 | −7.92 ± 0.05* | 12 | −8.90 ± 0.05* | 18 | −10.13 ± 0.09 | 6 | −9.58 ± 0.06 | 14 |
β1-TM7 | −8.54 ± 0.05 | 106.1 ± 2.5 | 10 | −8.45 ± 0.08 | 7 | −8.19 ± 0.06 | 5 | −7.80 ± 0.05* | 12 | −8.95 ± 0.05* | 18 | −10.06 ± 0.03 | 3 | −9.39 ± 0.05 | 13 |
CGP12177 Log EC50 | % Isoprenaline | n | Log KB CGP20712A | n | Log KB Bisoprolol | n | Log KB ICI118551 | n | Log KB Propranolol | n | Log KB Carvedilol | n | |||
CGP12177 as agonist: β1 stable cell lines | |||||||||||||||
β1-WT | −8.18 ± 0.08 | 73.8 ± 5.6 | 10 | −7.16 ± 0.06 | 14 | −5.83 ± 0.14 | 4 | −5.90 ± 0.15 | 9 | −6.18 ± 0.06 | 13 | −7.25 ± 0.18 | 7 | ||
β1-TM1 | −7.83 ± 0.05 | 53.7 ± 3.9 | 10 | −7.41 ± 0.13 | 11 | −5.77 ± 0.18 | 4 | −5.79 ± 0.09 | 3 | −6.55 ± 0.12 | 13 | −7.72 ± 0.13 | 7 | ||
β1-TM2 | −8.27 ± 0.09 | 53.5 ± 3.9 | 14 | −7.13 ± 0.08 | 13 | −6.72 ± 0.18 | 7 | −5.87 ± 0.05 | 6 | −6.87 ± 0.15* | 18 | −8.52 ± 0.15*,** | 7 | ||
β1-TM3 | −8.07 ± 0.03 | 70.5 ± 3.6 | 9 | −7.45 ± 0.05 | 12 | −5.83 ± 0.13 | 4 | −5.83 ± 0.09 | 7 | −6.31 ± 0.05 | 16 | −7.45 ± 0.09 | 6 | ||
β1-TM4 | −9.27 ± 0.06*,** | 29.2 ± 1.4*,** | 10 | −9.49 ± 0.08*,** | 9 | −8.83 ± 0.21*,** | 7 | −7.93 ± 0.11*,** | 11 | −8.85 ± 0.09*,** | 15 | −9.73 ± 0.21*,** | 7 | ||
β1-TM5 | −7.91 ± 0.03 | 60.1 ± 3.4 | 10 | −6.68 ± 0.04* | 11 | −5.31 ± 0.13 | 5 | −5.71 ± 0.15 | 8 | −6.23 ± 0.09 | 15 | −7.53 ± 0.16 | 7 | ||
β1-TM6 | −7.83 ± 0.02* | 63.5 ± 2.8 | 11 | −5.97 ± 0.08*,** | 12 | −5.22 ± 0.14 | 3 | −5.79 ± 0.04 | 11 | −6.05 ± 0.06 | 19 | −7.24 ± 0.18 | 7 | ||
β1-TM7 | −7.08 ± 0.02*,** | 68.5 ± 3.8 | 11 | −6.86 ± 0.05 | 10 | −5.67 ± 0.05 | 5 | −6.67 ± 0.03*,** | 13 | −6.42 ± 0.06 | 16 | −7.35 ± 0.12 | 6 |
P < 0.001; one-way ANOVA with post hoc Newman–Keuls comparing values from the mutant receptors with those obtained from the β1-WT. Thus, the log EC50 for CGP12177 at β1-TM4 is different from that obtained from the β1-WT with P < 0.001; **P < 0.001; one-way ANOVA with post hoc Newman–Keuls comparing each value with all other values in this set. Thus, the log EC50 value for CGP12177 at β1-TM4 is different from those obtained for β1-WT, β1-TM1, β1-TM2, β1-TM3, β1-TM5, β1-TM6, and β1-TM7, with P < 0.001 in all cases.