TABLE 4.
Cimaterol Log EC50 |
% Isoprenaline |
n |
Log KB CGP20712A |
n |
Log KB Bisoprolol |
n |
Log KB ICI118551 |
n |
Log KB Propranolol |
n |
Log KB CGP12177 |
n |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cimaterol as agonist: β2 stable cell lines | |||||||||||||
β2-WT | −9.05 ± 0.08 | 101.5 ± 3.2 | 13 | −6.03 ± 0.12 | 8 | −6.85 ± 0.10 | 8 | −9.56 ± 0.07 | 8 | −9.65 ± 0.05 | 14 | −10.00 ± 0.05 | 9 |
β2-TM1 | −9.45 ± 0.06 | 105.3 ± 2.8 | 9 | −6.46 ± 0.10 | 8 | −6.82 ± 0.09 | 10 | −9.74 ± 0.08 | 9 | −9.56 ± 0.06 | 19 | −9.74 ± 0.11 | 19 |
β2-TM2 | −9.64 ± 0.08* | 102.1 ± 1.8 | 12 | −7.20 ± 0.11* | 8 | −7.25 ± 0.10 | 7 | −9.30 ± 0.11 | 8 | −9.87 ± 0.03 | 14 | −10.01 ± 0.06 | 9 |
β2-TM3 | −9.21 ± 0.13 | 98.3 ± 4.1 | 7 | −6.57 ± 0.12 | 7 | −7.05 ± 0.13 | 6 | −9.71 ± 0.10 | 7 | −9.81 ± 0.07 | 11 | −10.00 ± 0.10 | 10 |
β2-TM4 | −9.66 ± 0.06* | 103.3 ± 2.4 | 13 | −6.09 ± 0.09 | 10 | −6.75 ± 0.03 | 9 | −8.87 ± 0.04* | 10 | −9.34 ± 0.06 | 14 | −9.83 ± 0.05 | 9 |
β2-TM5 | −8.97 ± 0.09 | 100.6 ± 2.4 | 13 | −6.63 ± 0.12 | 10 | −7.04 ± 0.09 | 9 | −9.50 ± 0.09 | 9 | −9.46 ± 0.04 | 13 | −9.82 ± 0.07 | 4 |
β2-TM6 | −8.74 ± 0.05 | 101.0 ± 4.7 | 12 | −7.05 ± 0.15* | 7 | −7.07 ± 0.10 | 9 | −8.86 ± 0.12* | 9 | −9.52 ± 0.06 | 11 | −9.59 ± 0.13 | 8 |
β2-TM7 | −8.77 ± 0.06 | 107.4 ± 2.9 | 10 | −6.54 ± 0.04 | 14 | −7.06 ± 0.09 | 11 | −9.18 ± 0.07 | 12 | −9.30 ± 0.06* | 17 | −9.72 ± 0.10 | 13 |
CGP12177 Log EC50 | % Isoprenaline | n | Log KB CGP20712A | n | Log KB Bisoprolol | n | Log KB ICI118551 | n | Log KB Propranolol | n | |||
CGP12177 as agonist: β2 stable cell lines | |||||||||||||
β2-WT | −9.35 ± 0.09 | 23.5 ± 3.9 | 14 | −6.12 ± 0.09 | 3 | −6.60 ± 0.14 | 11 | −9.31 ± 0.17 | 11 | −9.02 ± 0.12 | 19 | ||
β2-TM1 | −9.48 ± 0.19 | 26.9 ± 1.7 | 9 | −6.00 ± 0.16 | 9 | −6.63 ± 0.12 | 12 | −9.51 ± 0.17 | 12 | −9.07 ± 0.08 | 20 | ||
β2-TM2 | −9.20 ± 0.09 | 12.6 ± 1.9 | 11 | −6.79 ± 0.11 | 8 | −7.00 ± 0.09 | 9 | −9.03 ± 0.11 | 10 | −9.32 ± 0.10 | 14 | ||
β2-TM3 | −9.19 ± 0.10 | 35.9 ± 3.3 | 9 | −6.21 ± 0.29 | 4 | −6.53 ± 0.12 | 8 | −9.47 ± 0.16 | 8 | −8.95 ± 0.09 | 21 | ||
β2-TM4 | −9.20 ± 0.07 | 38.5 ± 2.4* | 13 | −6.05 ± 0.12 | 8 | −6.34 ± 0.09 | 7 | −8.42 ± 0.08* | 11 | −8.34 ± 0.08* | 18 | ||
β2-TM5 | −9.31 ± 0.07 | 28.8 ± 2.0 | 12 | −6.47 ± 0.15 | 8 | −6.98 ± 0.22 | 8 | −9.31 ± 0.08 | 9 | −8.75 ± 0.10 | 19 | ||
β2-TM6 | −8.81 ± 0.10 | 22.4 ± 1.6 | 8 | −7.31 ± 0.34 | 5 | −6.74 ± 0.11 | 5 | −8.39 ± 0.27 | 4 | −9.11 ± 0.11 | 4 | ||
β2-TM7 | −9.71 ± 0.12 | 41.3 ± 2.7* | 9 | −6.19 ± 0.15 | 10 | −6.59 ± 0.16 | 10 | −9.09 ± 0.14 | 9 | −9.02 ± 0.08 | 22 |
P < 0.001 One-way ANOVA with post hoc Newman–Keuls comparing values from the mutant receptors with those obtained from the β2-WT. Thus, the log KB value for CGP20712A at β2-TM2 obtained in the presence of cimaterol is different (P < 0.001) from that obtained in the β2-WT receptor. In contrast to data on the β1-receptor in Table 2, there are no values with P < 0.001 for one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Newman–Keuls comparing each value with all other values in this set.