Table 3.
Store sample by store type and level of neighbourhood deprivation
| Store type | Most deprived | 2 | 3 | 4 | Least deprived |
Total |
(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | |||||||
| Premium supermarket |
1 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
10 |
(2) |
| Large supermarket |
7 |
9 |
8 |
4 |
4 |
32 |
(5) |
| Discount supermarket |
8 |
7 |
12 |
3 |
5 |
35 |
(6) |
| Small supermarket |
13 |
31 |
34 |
24 |
25 |
127 |
(21) |
| ‘World’ store |
17 |
20 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
61 |
(10) |
| Convenience store |
44 |
72 |
77 |
39 |
36 |
268 |
(45) |
| Petrol station store |
10 |
10 |
22 |
8 |
18 |
68 |
(11) |
| Total n |
100 |
154 |
171 |
86 |
90 |
601 | |
| (%) | (17) | (26) | (28) | (14) | (15) | (100) |