Table 2.

Ranking of TrIFNS using different methods.

Ranking methods	${\tilde{S}}_{\mathrm{1}}$	${\tilde{S}}_{\mathrm{2}}$	${\tilde{S}}_{\mathrm{3}}$	${\tilde{S}}_{\mathrm{4}}$	Ranking results
Nan et al. [15]	0.7425	1.1775	1.0425	1.22	A 4≻A 2≻A 3≻A 1
Nehi [16] (k = 0.5)	0.39	0.598	0.54	0.622	A 4≻A 2≻A 3≻A 1
Wang and Nie [22]	0.37125	0.58875	0.52125	0.61	A 4≻A 2≻A 3≻A 1