Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 14.
Published in final edited form as: Shock. 2013 Aug;40(2):122–128. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31829ca519

Figure 5. Bacterial load in the peritoneal cavity following sham or sepsis (CLP) in wild type versus iNKT−/− mice.

Figure 5

Compared to their respective sham groups, both wild type (** p<0.001) and iNKT−/− mice (* p<0.001) displayed increased bacterial load following CLP. However, iNKT−/− mice exhibited significantly lower peritoneal bacterial load when compared with wild type mice following CLP (# p<0.001).