Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 4;15(1):646. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-646

Table 5.

Akaike information criterion (AIC) of models at first stage (M1, ⋯, M9) by year and location (L) for grain dry matter yield (Y)

Year L M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9
2009 G-L1 101.7 84.3 45.5 47.2 20.4 6.9 45.6 0 1.7
2009 G-L2 83.1 67.5 50.9 38.5 31.4 20.7 40.7 0.5 0
2009 G-L3 45.7 30.4 41.5 31.1 40.1 26.9 31.2 1.0 0
2009 G-L4 125.0 19.1 125.1 114.9 90.3 19.6 115.5 65.0 0
2009 G-L5 29.1 8.0 18.1 24.5 15.3 1.2 12.3 0
2009 G-L6 51.6 47.6 37.7 29.5 41.7 35.4 29.4 0 1.2
2009 G-L7 81.5 56.1 55.3 62.8 36.5 11.0 55.5 5.1 0
2009 P-L1 126.4 115.6 121.6 116.3 109.5 108.8 116.2 0 1.9
2009 P-L2 62.3 45.4 62.4 54.6 57.3 47.2 54.9 1.5 0
2009 P-L3 120.9 65.9 116.1 105.5 99.7 49.6 105.5 17.3 0
2009 P-L4 145.9 98.6 132.8 126.4 126.4 80.1 126.4 0.4 0
2010 G-L1 35.5 4.9 35.6 31.5 12.3 0 32.0 12.3 1.8
2010 G-L2 25.0 7.2 27.0 21.7 29.7 11.9 19.7 0 -3.2
2010 G-L4 141.4 74.2 128.7 117.1 130.2 57.4 118.4 5.0 0
2010 G-L5 21.6 0 23.4 22.9 21.9 3.3 22.9 22.1 2.8
2010 G-L6 80.9 60.0 72.8 59.8 55.4 41.5 61.1 0 0.6
2010 G-L7 69.5 22.3 56.2 47.8 37.2 23.6 48.1 2.6 0
2010 G-L8 40.8 24.7 32.1 22.6 27.7 19.6 23.1 0 1.4
2010 P-L1 38.8 5.7 38.8 38.8 39.4 9.4 40.8 39.1 0
2010 P-L2 40.0 0.7 41.6 36.1 39.8 4.1 36.9 4.3 0
2010 P-L3 66.4 0 68.4 67.2 69.5 3.7 70.4 71.5 5.7
2010 P-L4 95.0 80.4 90.5 79.1 87.0 66.7 79.4 0 3.2
Counts 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 7 12
0% 9% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0.00 32% 55%
2012 G-L4 35.3 0 35.3 36.2 26.0 0.6 35.3 24.2
2012 G-L5 66.3 2.6 67.0 66.3 42.1 5.9 21.5 0
2012 G-L6 148.4 131.4 93.8 93.7 18.7 18.7 89.9 0 0
2012 G-L7 38.3 4.5 40.3 38.3 36.3 0 42.3 1.9
2012 G-L8 45.3 39.8 37.7 33.5 35.6 37.3 33.9 1.9 0
2012 G-L9 402.3 321.5 200.9 181.7 81.9 81.9 191.6 0 0
2012 G-L10 39.7 0 41.5 41.4 22.1 3.5 43.5 6.7 1.1
2012 G-L11 18.0 0 19.7 18.0 8.4 1.2 21.6 3.7
2012 P-L1 189.5 168.8 158.9 148.9 146.3 137.8 149.1 0 1.7
2012 P-L2 127.4 49.3 129.1 122.6 129.7 49.9 123.9 5.9 0
2012 P-L3 107.8 55.3 103.1 95.0 101.0 49.3 96.1 7.9 0
2012 P-L4 226.3 0.2 226.3 222.1 226.3 0 226.3 226.3 2.0
2012 P-L5 13.2 0 13.2 13.2 11.9 1.5 13.2 13.9 3.5
2012 P-L6 79.0 54.8 70.4 66.9 65.8 37.9 67.0 0 1.7
Counts 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 4 6
0% 29% 0% 0% 0% 14% 0% 29% 43%

Table shows ΔAIC relative to the best model. Boldfaced entries in the table indicate best model (fit) within location. Empty cells (–) correspond to locations where the model did not converge. In italics, we report the models that converged but the Hessian matrix was not positive definite.