Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 14;9(8):e103235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103235

Table 4. Dominance of spinosad resistance based on a range of spinosad concentrations including LC50s from the susceptible parental strains and pooled F1 progeny of reciprocal crosses estimated for the tomato borer Tuta absoluta.

Concentrations (µg a.i./mL) Strains No. insects Mortality (%) Survival performance Estimated dominance (h)
0.005 Spinosad-resistant 19 0.00 1.00 -
Spinosad-susceptible 29 3.45 0.97 -
Pooled F1 of reciprocal crosses 30 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.05 Spinosad-resistant 25 0.00 1.00 -
Spinosad-susceptible 28 25.00 0.75 -
Pooled F1 of reciprocal crosses 29 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.50 Spinosad-resistant 22 0.00 1.00 -
Spinosad-susceptible 30 100.00 0.00 -
Pooled F1 of reciprocal crosses 31 58.06 0.42 0.42
5.00 Spinosad-resistant 21 0.00 1.00 -
Spinosad-susceptible 29 100.00 0.00 -
Pooled F1 of reciprocal crosses 30 100.00 0.00 0.00
10.00 Spinosad-resistant 29 13.79 0.86 -
Spinosad-susceptible 31 100.00 0.00 -
Pooled F1 of reciprocal crosses 30 100.00 0.00 0.00

The concentration range used also discriminates for high spinosad resistance, as observed in the spinosad-selected strain. The estimated dominance (h) varies from 0 (completely recessive) to 1 (completely dominant), where 0.5 corresponds to co-dominance, 0<h<0.5 corresponds to incompletely recessive and 0.5<h<1.0 corresponds to incompletely dominant.