Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug;15(4):278–292. doi: 10.2174/1389202915666140602230106

Table 3.

Comparison of characteristics for 4tU-labeling, TRAP and INTACT methods.

  4tU-labeling, pulse
(< 1 hour)
4tU-labeling
(several hours)
TRAP INTACT
mRNA + + + +
rRNA + + + +
tRNA + + - +
non-coding RNA + + + (subset) +
unprocessed RNA + + - +
highly dynamic RNA populations ++ + + +
“steady-state” RNA pool - + + +/-
cell-type specific RNA population + + + +
identifies differences in RNA expression before and after treatment or in disease models ++ + + +
possible biases rRNA is highly abundant and could bias RNAseq libraries, especially if the number of mRNA transcripts is limited rRNA abundance some long intergenic noncoding RNAs display low ribosome binding; differences in ribosomal occupancy of transcripts rRNA abundance,  transcripts encoding proteins regulating transcription and mitosis might be overrepresented
purification steps described before RNAseq rRNA depletion rRNA depletion - none described