Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 8;10:477–491. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S67154

Table 4.

Subgroup analysis performed according to study-level characteristics considered as potential sources of heterogeneity for the outcome LVEF

Subdivision N SMD (95% CI) SMD =0
Z
P-value I2a %
All studies 18 0.47 (0.20, 0.74) 3.46 0.001 80.8
Concealment of randomization
 Yes 13 0.46 (0.11, 0.81) 2.59 0.010 85.1
 Inadequate/unclear 5 0.49 (0.19, 0.80) 3.18 0.001 36,1
Outcome assessor blinded to treatment group
 Yes 15 0.44 (0.13, 0.74) 2.83 0.005 83.0
 Inadequate/unclear 3 0.47 (0.20, 0.74) 4.07 0.0001 00.0
Intention-to-treat strategy
 Yes 14 0.46 (0.14, 0.79) 2.79 0.005 84.0
 No/unclear 4 0.50 (0.10, 0.90) 2.47 0.014 51.2
A priori power estimation
 Yes 7 0.15 (−0.06, 0.36) 1.38 0.168 37.5
 No/unclear 11 0.67 (0.24, 1.10) 3.08 0.002 84.8
Dropouts
 Yes 8 0.03 (−0.57, 0.51) 0.11 0.910 92.5
 No/unclear 10 −1.06 (−1.38, −0.73) 6.31 0.0001 59.5
Nonbiased and powered studies
 Yes 8 0.17 (−0.02, 0.36) 1.74 0.082 32.0
 No 10 0.71 (0.23, 1.19) 2.91 0.004 86.1

Note:

a

I2= the variation in SMD due to heterogeneity.

Abbreviations: LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; SMD, standardized mean difference; CI, confidence interval.