Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Jun 24;43(6):1149–1158. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0327-x

Table 3.

Logistic and Poisson regression models predicting number of sexual partners, sex with a stranger, and irregular condom use

Number of Sexual Partnersa Exp(B) 95% CI
 Negative Urgency 1.14 .95-1.36
 Sensation Seeking 1.21* 1.02-1.46
 Go/No-Go 1.15 .95-1.40
 BART 1.20* 1.01-1.43
 Skin Conductance Reactivityc 1.02 .89-1.17
Sex with Strangerb
 Negative Urgency 1.43 .88-2.34
 Sensation Seeking 1.82* 1.06-3.12
 Go/No-Go 1.30 .81-2.08
 BART 1.68* 1.01-2.80
 Skin Conductance Reactivityc 1.70* 1.04-2.79
Irregular Condom Usea
 Negative Urgency 1.15* 1.02-1.29
 Sensation Seeking .95 .82-1.10
 Go/No-Go 1.00 .89-1.13
 BART .95 .83-1.09
 Skin Conductance Reactivityc .89 .79-1.01

Note. BART = Balloon Analog Risk Task.

a

Poisson regression conducted.

b

Logistic regression conducted.

c

Average of skin conductance reactivity scores across pleasant and unpleasant images.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.