. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: Otol Neurotol. 2014 Sep;35(8):1345–1353. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000323

Table 4.

Candidacy prediction for separate 8 ears based on the data collected for 20 ears

	SRD		Predicted aided AzBio^†	Candidacy prediction^‡	Clinical aided AzBio	Clinical Candidacy
S123 (L)	1.2	> 0.845^*	58%	No	N/A^ǂ	No
S123 (R)	1.58	< 0.845^*	79%		92%

S124 (L)	0.76	< 0.845^*	35%	Yes	1%	Yes
S124 (R)	0.43	< 0.845^*	17%		16%

S125 (L)	0.62	< 0.845^*	27%	Yes	36%	Yes
S125 (R)	0.28	< 0.845^*	9%		7%

S126 (L)	0.29	< 0.845^*	10%	Yes	11%	Yes
S126 (R)	0.33	> 0.845^*	12%		9%

The optimal cutoff estimated using the ROC curve

^†

AzBio scores were predicted using Eq. 3.

^‡

When the predicted AzBio scores or the optimal SRD cutoff value was used, the same prediction was shown.

^ǂ

S123 did not complete the AzBio sentence test for his right ear due to participation schedule constraints.