Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Breast J. 2014 Mar 27;20(3):249–257. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12255

Table 5.

Relative odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with increasing levels of computed bilateral mammographic density asymmetry scores in three paired comparisons of different case groups

Positive vs. Negative Positive vs. Benign Benign vs. Negative
Subgroup Case No. OR 95%CI Case No. OR 95%CI Case No. OR 95%CI
1 25 – 68 1.00 baseline 32 – 59 1.00 baseline 33 – 59 1.00 baseline
2 42 – 50 2.28 [1.26, 4.23] 29 – 64 0.84 [0.45, 1.54] 41 – 51 1.43 [0.80, 2.60]
3 49 – 43 3.10 [1.68, 5.73] 46 – 46 1.84 [1.02, 3.34] 46 – 46 1.78 [0.99, 3.23]
4 44 – 48 2.49 [1.35, 4.61] 55 – 37 2.74 [1.51, 4.99] 52 – 40 2.32 [1.28, 4.20]
5 70 – 21 9.07 [4.64, 17.7] 68 – 24 5.22 [2.77, 9.85] 58 – 34 3.05 [1.67, 5.56]
P value 1 0.038 0.014 < 0.001
1

P value for F-test of zero slope of a regression between mammographic density asymmetrical score levels and adjusted odds ratios (in log scale).