Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 17.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Apr 22;43(4):779–788. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0303-5

Table 3.

Regression Analysis of Demographic Correlates of Unprotected Anal Intercourse with Men and HIV Testing

Any Unprotected Anal Intercourse (regardless of partner HIV status) Any Unprotected Anal Intercourse (w/unknown or positive HIV status partners) Ever been HIV tested
O.R. (95% C.I.) O.R. (95% C.I.) O.R. (95% C.I.)
Mean age (years) 0.96 (0.90, 1.03) 1.01 (0.93, 1.09) 1.03 (0.96, 1.11)
Currently employed 0.86 (0.37, 2.00) 1.01 (0.41, 2.48) 0.60 (0.26, 1.34)
Have any university education 2.79 (1.27, 6.13)b 0.93 (0.39, 2.21) 2.32 (1.07, 5.04)b
Monthly income > $1000 USD 1.32 (0.53, 3.27) 0.51 (0.17, 1.50) 2.50 (0.99, 6.30)a
In a committed relationship 2.81 (1.38, 5.72)c 0.15 (0.06, 0.38)d 4.26 (2.07, 8.80)d
Refugee 1.05 (0.36, 3.07) 0.92 (0.26, 3.24) 0.76 (0.26, 2.22)
Self-identify as gay 1.53 (0.65, 3.63) 1.68 (0.58, 4.86) 1.54 (0.65, 3.66)
a

p < .10;

b

p < .05;

c

p < .01;

d

p < .001

Note that each of the models included these characteristics of the person who recruited the respondent as covariates: age and binary indicators of gay self-identification, born in Lebanon, high income, and recent sex with women.