Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 7.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2014 Jan 10;16(3):864–867. doi: 10.1021/ol403631k

Table 1.

Optimization of the Reaction Conditions.a

graphic file with name nihms611353u1.jpg
entry catalyst additiveb solvent temp (°C) yield %
1 Et2O 23 0
2 CuCl Et2O 23 53
3 FeCl2 Et2O 23 36
4c FeCl2/SIMes THF 23 0
5 CoCl2 Et2O 23 6
6 Ni(PPh3)2Cl2 THF 23 3
7 NiCl2·dme Et2O 23 0
8 CuCl2 Et2O 23 17
9 CuBr Et2O 23 21
10 CuCl THF 23 45
11 CuCl PhMe 23 38
12 CuCl Et2O 0 44
13 CuCl Et2O −20 25
14 CuCl Et2O 50 42
15 CuCl LiCl Et2O 23 67
16 CuCl ZnBr2 Et2O 23 0
17 CuCl tmeda Et2O 23 2
18 CuCl MgCl2 Et2O 23 95
19 CuCl MgF2 Et2O 23 37
20 CuCl LiF Et2O 23 96
a

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.17 mmol), 2 (1.5 equiv), catalyst (10 mol %), in the solvent (1 mL) under Ar for 12 h.

b

1.5 equiv

c

SIMes = 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene.