Table 1. Cranio-cervical angle at different evaluation times.
Patient | Age | Sex (M=1; F=2) |
Initial angle | Angle with biteplate * | Final angle |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 8 | 1 | 115 | 112 | 114 |
2 | 8 | 1 | 114 | 110 | 114 |
3 | 7 | 2 | 119 | 117 | 119 |
4 | 7 | 1 | 99 | 100 | 100 |
5 | 7 | 2 | 102 | 100 | 101 |
6 | 8 | 1 | 109 | 108 | 108 |
7 | 7 | 2 | 113 | 111 | 113 |
8 | 9 | 2 | 114 | 112 | 112 |
9 | 7 | 1 | 110 | 108 | 110 |
10 | 8 | 1 | 116 | 113 | 116 |
11 | 7 | 2 | 114 | 112 | 114 |
12 | 7 | 1 | 103 | 100 | 100 |
Statistically significant difference between the initial cranio-cervical angles and the angles with the biteplate in place (p = 0.000). Data analysis was carried out with the aid of IBM SPSS Statistics 2.0. Descriptive statistics were performed and the Student’s t-test was used for comparisons among the evaluation times, with the level of significance set to 95% (p < 0.05).