Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 1;16(9):604–610. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0048

Table 2.

Ultrasonographic Findings and Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education Categories in the Two Patient Groups

  Carotid bruit detected No carotid bruit detected Matched OR (95% CI) P
Carotid stenosis
 ≥50% 15 (30.0) 2 (4.0) 14.0 (1.8–106.5) 0.001
 ≥70% 5 (10.0) 1 (2.0) 5.0 (0.6–42.8) 0.22
Hard or mixed plaque 39 (78.0) 26 (52.0) 4.3 (1.4–12.6) 0.007
CIMT
 >1.0 mm 26 (52.0) 9 (18.0) 5.3 (1.8–15.3) 0.001
 ≥75th percentilea 30 (66.7) 20 (44.4) 3.0 (1.1–8.3) 0.041
SHAPE category
 Lower/moderate 1 (2.0) 2 (4.0)    
 Moderately high 1 (2.0) 3 (6.0)   0.018
 High 33 (66.0) 43 (86.0)    
 Very high 15 (30.0) 2 (4.0)    
a

n=45 for case/control pairs, both of whom were within the <85 year age range used by the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) guidelines.

CI, confidence interval; CIMT, carotid intima-medial thickness; OR, odds ratio.