Table 3.
Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Trait Anger Predicting Perceived Support (n=95)
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | B | SE B | β | B | SE B | β | B | SE B | β |
Sex | 1.25 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 1.40 | 1.11 | 0.15 | 1.46 | 1.13 | 0.13 |
Income | 0.25 | 0.62 | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.57 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.55 | 0.04 |
Years since HIV diagnosis | −0.05 | 0.63 | −0.08 | −0.01 | 0.06 | −0.02 | −0.01 | 0.06 | −0.02 |
Trait anger | −0.17 | 0.09 | −0.19 | −0.28 | 0.12 | −0.31a | |||
Life stress | −4.59 | 1.13 | −0.41b | −4.69 | 1.13 | −0.42b | |||
Trait anger×life stress | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.18 | ||||||
R2 | 0.01 | 0.212 | 0.220 | ||||||
F | 0.69 | 5.53b | 4.94b |
Trait anger was centered at its mean.
p<0.05; bp<0.01.