Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 18;4:6121. doi: 10.1038/srep06121

Figure 1. The number of extreme events versus velocity and mobility.

Figure 1

For a network of N = 1200 nodes in a square domain of size L = 10 (arbitrary unit), (a), The number of extreme events nex versus the agent velocity v for W = 50N, 80N, and 100N; (b), nex of extreme events versus velocity v when nodes execute random walk (R) or deterministic motion (D) within square, circular, and stadium-shaped domains. The areas of the circle and the stadium are chosen to be equal to the area of the square L × L. (c), Robustness of control with respect to heterogeneity in the nodal communication range: nex versus v for β = −1, 0, and 1, where β is a parameter characterizing the distribution of nodal communication range. (d) and (e), robustness of control with respect to packet-transportation protocol: nex versus velocity v when packet generation and annihilation are taken into account for two situations where (d) the total number of packets is fixed at W and (e) the number of newly generated packets at each time step is fixed to be W/N. (f), Generalization of mobility: nex versus mobility, defined as the probability that a node moves with velocity v, for a number of v values. All simulation results are obtained using 100 realizations in T = 1000 time steps. The error bars in nex from different realizations have relatively small and similar magnitude in (a–e), and it monotonously increases with velocity v, as shown in panel (a) [the error bars in (b–e) are omitted for clear visualization]. Here, the definition of an extreme event on a node is that its number of packets is at least four standard-deviations above the average.