Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 6;100(3):833–849. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.086314

TABLE 3.

Characteristics of intervention studies that examined effects of monosaccharide fructose, sucrose, HFCS, other fructose-supplemented, or fructose-reduced diets on indexes of liver health1

First author, pub year (ref) [country]; study design Participants (ethnicity) Participants enrolled/analyzed M Baseline age, (range)2 BMI or body weight3 Source of dietary fructose in interventions Interventions (participants) Energy balance of study design Duration of intervention (washout duration) Outcomes assessed (primary or secondary endpoint) Funding source Risk of bias
n % y
Adults
 Aeberli, 2011 (46) [Switzerland]; crossover RCT Healthy M living in Zurich (NR) 29/24 100.0 26.3 (NR) 22.4 kg/m2 Fructose, sucrose, or glucose sweetened SSBs Fructose in SSB, 40, 80 g/d compared with sucrose in SSB, 40, 80 g/d, compared with glucose in SSB, 40, 80 g/d (n = 25–27) Hypercaloric 3 wk (4 wk) AST, ALT (secondary) Nonprofit and industry Low
 Al-Waili, 2003 (52) [United Arab Emirates]; before-and-after trial Healthy volunteers from medical staff (NR) 10/10 70.0 31.2 (20–45) NR Honey, 1.2 g/kg body weight Fructose, 0.46 g fructose/kg body weight (n = 10) Hypercaloric 2 wk ALT, AST, ALP (NR) NR Medium
 Bravo, 2013 (59) [United States]; parallel RCT Healthy men and women, not taking any prescription medicine or over-the counter products for weight loss (NR) 80/64 56 38.7 (20–60) 23–35 kg/m2 HFCS-55 or sucrose-sweetened low-fat (1%) milk HFCS at 8% (n = 8), 18% (n = 12), or 30% (n = 11) of energy requirement compared with sucrose at 8% (n = 13), 18% (n = 10), or 30% (n = 10) of energy requirement Isocaloric (on the basis of lack of significant differences in total energy intake or body weight during study) 10 wk Liver fat by unenhanced computed tomography (primary) Industry Medium
 Couchepin, 2008 (53) [Switzerland]; crossover RCT Healthy young M and F adults (white) 16/16 50.0 22.7 (NR) 21.8 kg/m2 NR Fructose, 3.5 g/kg fat-free mass/d (+38% of daily energy) compared with isocaloric diet (n = 16) Hypercaloric 6 d (28 d) ALT (NR) Nonprofit Medium
 Faeh, 2005 (55) [Switzerland]; before-and-after trial Healthy, young adult M (NR) 7/7 100.0 NR (22–31) 71.5 kg D-Fructose (Fluka Chemie Gmbh) in as a 20% fructose solution with 3 main meals Fructose, 3 g/kg body weight (n = 7)4 Hypercaloric Fructose, 6 d (isocaloric diet given 3 d before intervention and acted as washout between interventions) Hepatic de novo lipogenesis (NR) Nonprofit High
 Johnston, 2013 (67) [United Kingdom]; parallel RCT Healthy centrally overweight men, aged 18–50 y (NR) 32/32 100.0 34 (NR) 29 kg/m2 Monosaccharaides were consumed 4 times/d in divided amounts mixed with 500 mL H2O Fructose, 25% total energy requirements compared with glucose 25% total energy requirements Isocaloric (period 1) and hypercaloric (period 2) 2 wk IHCLs (primary); ALT, AST, GGT (secondary) Nonprofit Low
 Kelsay, 1974 (60) [United States]; crossover RCT Healthy F students at the University of Maryland (NR) 8/8 0.0 NR (18–23) 43.6–65.3kg Uncooked fondant patties made with sucrose Sucrose, 850 kcal/d compared with glucose, 850 kcal/d compared with isocaloric diet (n = 8) Isocaloric Sucrose and glucose, 4 wk (control consumed 1 wk before each period and 2 wk washout between sucrose and glucose) ALKP, ALT, AST (NR) NR Medium
 Koh, 1988 (47) [United States]; Non-RCT IGT adults. Controls: University and faculty staff (NR) 18/18 IGT: 33; control: 33 IGT: 54 (NR); control: 50 (NR) IGT: 164 lb; control: 145 lb Free fructose in packets, mixed with unsweetened fruit juice, milk, and water Fructose, 15% total energy compared with glucose packets, 15% total energy (n = 18)5 Isocaloric 4 wk Bilirubin (NR) NR Medium
 Lê, 2006 (56) [Switzerland]; before-and-after trial Healthy, moderately physically active, young adult M 7/7 100 24.7 (NR) 69.3 kg Pure fructose in 20% solution with the 3 main meals Fructose, 1.5 g · kg−1 · d−1 representing an excess of 18% of the daily energy requirement (n = 7) Hypercaloric 4 wk IHCLs (NR) Nonprofit High
 Lê, 2009 (54) [Switzerland]; crossover RTC Healthy, M adult offspring of type 2 diabetes patients and healthy M adults 24/24 100 24.7 (NR) NR Pure fructose in 20% solution Fructose, 3.5 g · kg−1 · d−1 compared with isocaloric diet (n = 24) Hypercaloric 7 d (4–5-wk washout) IHCLs (primary), ALT (secondary) Nonprofit and industry High
 Maersk, 2012 (61) [Denmark]; parallel RCT Healthy, nondiabetic, middle-aged adults 60/47 37 38.7 (20-50) 32 kg/m2 Sucrose-sweetened cola (Coca Cola) Sucrose 106 g/d (n = 10) compared with diet cola (n = 12) compared with semi-skimmed milk (n = 12) compared with water (n = 13) Isocaloric (on the basis of dietary questionnaire and weight change) 6 mo IHCLs (primary) Government, nonprofit, and industry High
 Ngo Sock, 2010 (48) [Switzerland]; crossover RCT Healthy, moderately physically active adult M 11/11 100 24.6 (NR) NR Pure fructose in 20% solution Fructose, 3.5 g · kg−1 · d−1 compared with glucose, 3.5 g · kg−1 · d−1 compared with weight-maintenance diet (n = 11) Hypercaloric 7 d (2–3-wk washout) IHCLs (primary); ALT, AST (secondary) Nonprofit Medium
 Perez-Polo, 2010 (57) [Spain]; before-and-after trial Healthy, older adult M (NR) 74 100.0 51 (NR) 28.5 kg/m2 Free fructose in 10% solution Fructose, 200 g/d (n = 36); fructose with allopurinol, 200 g/d (n = 38) Hypercaloric 2 wk ALT, AST, GGT (secondary) Nonprofit Medium
 Porikos, 1983 (62) [United States]; before-and-after trial Middle-aged adult M (NR) 21 100.0 NR (24-45) NR6 Snacks and food with sucrose Sucrose, 25–30% kcal (n = 21) Hypercaloric 30 d ALT, AST (primary) Government and industry High
 Purkins, 2004 (63) [UK]; crossover RCT Healthy adult M (NR) 12 /12 100.0 NR (20-41) NR Readily available sucrose-containing food High-carbohydrate diet (sucrose, 1408 kcal/d; 4500 kcal/d), compared with high-fat diet (sucrose 180 kcal/d; 4500 kcal/d) compared with standard diet (1900 kcal/d) (n = 12) Hypercaloric 8 d (14-d washout) ALP, ALT, AST, GGT, bilirubin (primary) Industry High
 Silbernagel, 2011 (50); Silbernagel, 2012 (49) [Germany]; parallel RCT Healthy, middle-aged adults 25/20 60 30.5 (20–50) 25.9 kg/m2 Pure fructose powder dissolved in water Fructose, 150 g/d (n = 10) compared with glucose, 150 g/d (n = 10) Hypercaloric 4 wk IHCLs (primary) Nonprofit High
 Sobrecases, 2010 (58) [Switzerland]; non-RCT Healthy adult M 30/30 100 23.9 (NR) 22.6 kg/m2 NR Fructose, 3.5 g/kg (n = 12) compared with high fat, 30% total energy as saturated fat (n = 10) compared with fructose plus high fat (n = 8) Hypercaloric Fructose: 7 d, high fat and fructose and high fat: 4 d IHCLs (primary), ALT (secondary) Nonprofit High
 Stanhope, 2009 (51); Cox, 2012 (68) [United States]; parallel RCT Healthy, older adults (NR) First 23 enrolled people/18 (DNL outcome); 39/32 (liver enzyme outcomes) 50.0 53.7 (NR) 29.3 kg/m2 Free fructose added to unsweetened beverage (Kool-Aid; Kraft) Fructose (+25% of daily energy) (n = 10) compared with glucose SSB (+25% of daily energy) (n = 8) Hypercaloric 10 wk7 Hepatic de novo lipogenesis, ALT, AST, GGT (NR) Government High (DNL outcome); medium (liver enzyme outcomes)
 Theytaz, 2012 (64) [Switzerland]; crossover RCT Healthy, nonobese, nonsmokers, and sedentary M 9/9 100 23.3 (NR) 22.6 kg/m2 Pure fructose provided as drinks 5 times/d Fructose, 3 g/kg, + essential amino acid (+38% of daily energy) compared with Fructose, 3 g/kg plus placebo (+36% of daily energy) compared with weight-maintenance diet (n = 9) Hypercaloric 6 d (4–10-wk washout) IHCLs (primary) Industry Medium
 Volynets, 2012 (69) [Germany]; before-and-after trial Patients with NAFLD, diagnosed by ultrasound and blood variables (NR) 15/10 40 45.5 (34.5–51.5) 31.1 Reduction in the consumption of fructose-rich foods (eg, to avoid sweets, lemonades, fruit juices) and to prefer foods with a lower content of fructose Nutritionists advised patients to reduce their daily fructose intake by 50% Hypocaloric 6 mo IHCLs (primary); ALT, AST, GGT (secondary) Nonprofit High
Children
 Vos, 2009 (65) [United States]; parallel RCT Children with NAFLD (NR)8 10 NR 13.0 (2.1) Elimination of sugar-containing beverages, fruit juice, and HFCS Low fructose (−20 g/d fructose intake) (n = 6) compared with low fat (−15 g/d fructose intake) (n = 4)9 Hypocaloric 6 mo ALT, AST (secondary) Nonprofit and government High
1

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALKP, alkanine phosphatase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; DNL, de novo lipogenesis; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptase; HFCS, high-fructose corn syrup; HFCS-55, high-fructose corn syrup (55% fructose and 45% glucose); IGT, impaired glucose intolerant; IHCL, intrahepatocellular lipid; NR, not reported; pub, publication; RCT, randomized controlled trial; ref, reference; SSB, sugar sweetened beverage.

2

All values are means; ranges in parentheses.

3

All values are means or ranges; BMI z score in parentheses.

4

Study design included fish oil compared with fish oil and fructose compared with fructose. Fish-oil interventions were not included in the analysis.

5

A nonrandomized crossover trial. Ranges of fructose intake reported were as follows: fructose and glucose = for IGT, 45–83 g/d; for control, 45–112 g/d.

6

Fifteen normal-weight and 6 overweight subjects.

7

Ten-week duration included an 8-wk hypercaloric diet and 2-wk isocaloric diet.

8

Seven children (70%) with a confirmatory liver biopsy that showed nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

9

Low fructose denoted the elimination of sugar-containing beverages, fruit juice, and food items that were high in high-fructose corn syrup. Low fat according to the American Heart Association recommendation.