Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;21(7):752–767. doi: 10.1111/acem.12419

Table 3.

Change in beliefs and opinions on HIV/HCV screening and risk and uptake of HIV/HCV screening

Belief or Opinion No Intervention n=197 Intervention n=198 Intervention - No Intervention Δ1 - Δ2 (95% CI)

Pre Post Post - Pre Δ1 Pre Post Post - Pre Δ2
Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE) ΔMean (95% CI)
Change in value of combined HIV/HCV screening
 Value for all 3.36 (0.07) 3.26 (0.07) −0.09 (0.06) 3.46 (0.06) 3.40 (0.07) − 0.06 (0.06) 0.037 (−0.13 to 0.20)
 Value for me 2.54 (0.10) 2.63 (0.10) 0.08 (0.07) 2.64 (0.10) 2.72 (0.10) 0.07 (0.09) −0.004 (−0.23 to 0.22)
Change in self-perception of HIV/HCV risk
 HIV 0.58 (0.07) 0.62 (0.06) 0.06 (0.05) 0.77 (0.07) 0.85 (0.08) 0.12 (0.06) 0.062 (−0.083 to 0.21)
 HCV 0.52 (0.06) 0.53 (0.06) 0.04 (0.05) 0.67 (0.07) 0.82 (0.08) 0.12 (0.06) 0.091 (−0.055 to 0.24)
Change in opinions regarding ED-based HIV/HCV screening
 ED is too stressful place for testing 2.05 (0.08) 1.83 (0.08) −0.19 (0.08) 1.95 (0.08) 1.75 (0.07) −0.18 (0.08) −0.23 (−0.49 to 0.034)
 ED is not a private enough place for testing 2.21 (0.09) 1.89 (0.08) −0.29 (0.08) 2.03 (0.09) 1.79 (0.08) −0.23 (0.08) −0.048 (−0.26 to 0.17)
 Being tested in the ED delays medical care 2.16 (0.09) 1.73 (0.06) −0.45 (0.08) 2.20 (0.08) 1.67 (0.07) −0.51 (0.07) −0.001 (−0.22 to 0.22)
 Being tested in the ED takes too long 2.16 (0.10) 1.76 (0.07) −0.39 (0.09) 2.28 (0.09) 1.68 (0.07) −0.62 (0.09) 0.041 (−0.18 to 0.26)
% % Δ% (95% CD)
Uptake of HIV/HCV screening 64.5 65.2 −0.7 (−10.1 to 8.7)

Δ= Difference; SE = Standard Error; HCV = Hepatitis C virus; HIV = Human immunodeficiency virus