TABLE 5.
Examples of potentiometric and amperometric electrochemical biosensors for detection of whole bacterial cellsa
Biosensor type | Bacterium | Transducer | Technique | Bioreceptor | LOD | Comment | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Potentiometric | Sulfate-reducing bacteria | Glassy carbon electrode | Potentiometric stripping analysis | None | 2.3 × 10–2.3 × 107 CFU/ml | Need bacterial processing | 74 |
Staphylococcus aureus | Single-walled carbon nanotubes | EMF | Aptamer | 8 × 102 CFU/ml | Bacterium-spiked pig skin | 75 | |
Amperometric | E. coli | Photolithographic gold | Immunomagnetic/amperometric in flow cells | Antibody | 55 cells/ml in PBS, 100 cells/ml in milk | No contact of biocomponent with sensor | 76 |
E. coli K-12 | Screen-printed carbon electrodes | Phage-induced release and subsequent quantitation of bacterial intracellular enzyme | Bacteriophage | 1 CFU/100 ml | Cells not intact after analysis | 77 | |
Heat-killed E. coli | SCE | Amperometric detection of secondary antibody with GOD | Biotinyl antibody | 3 × 101–3.2 × 106 CFU/ml, down to 15 CFU/ml | Labeling needed but tested in synthetic stool | 78 | |
Staphylococcus aureus | DropSens screen-printed gold electrodes | HRP H2O2-mediated immunosensor | Antibody | 1 CFU/ml of raw milk | Indirect, label needed | 79 |
Abbreviations: SCE, saturated calomel electrode; GOD, glucose oxidase; EMF, electron motive force; HRP, horseradish peroxidase.