Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul;27(3):490–526. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00091-13

TABLE 4.

Clinical studies evaluating Aspergillus sp. PCR methodsa

Study (reference no.) Date (yr) published Study design Patient population Type of PCR Type of specimen tested Primer target Method utilized to determine accuracy Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Comments
PCR studies
    Bucheidt et al. (126) 2001 Retrospective 67 febrile neutropenic patients and 33 immunocompetent individuals were tested with BAL fluid PCR, and 218 patients with hematologic malignancies and 60 immunocompetent individuals were tested with blood PCR Nested PCR BAL fluid and whole blood 18S rDNA Comparison to MSG criteria 100 for BAL fluid, 91.7 for whole blood 92.6 for BAL fluid, 83.6 for whole blood
    Raad et al. (127) 2002 Prospective 54 patients with cancer and pulmonary infiltrates; 4 had definite infection Traditional PCR with detection through ethidium bromide staining Whole blood Mitochondrial DNA and alkaline protease gene Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 100 for definite IA, 57 for probable and possible IA 100
    Bucheidt et al. (128) 2002 Retrospective 176 patients, including 141 febrile neutropenic patients Nested PCR BAL fluid 18S rDNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 93.9 94.4
    Raad et al. (129) 2002 Prospective 249 cancer patients with pulmonary infiltrates Traditional PCR with ethidium bromide staining or Southern blotting BAL fluid Mitochondrial DNA and alkaline protease gene Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 80 for proven IA, 64 for probable IA 93
    Las-Flörl et al. (130) 2004 Prospective 36 patients receiving antifungals due to suspicious pulmonary infiltrates PCR-ELISA 205 whole-blood specimens, 15 FNA or biopsy specimens, 21 BAL fluid or tracheal secretion specimens 18S rRNA gene Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria For proven IA, 100 for FNA/biopsy specimens and 40 for whole blood; for probable IA, 66 for lung fluid and 44 for whole blood 100 (all possible IA patients were considered truly negative)
    Buchheidt et al. (131) 2004 Prospective 165 patients with hematologic malignancies or HSCT from 6 centers Nested PCR followed by ethidium bromide staining. Positive nested PCR specimens were also tested by qPCR with fluorescent probes 1,522 samples of various types 18S rRNA gene for nested PCR and mitochondrial cytochrome b gene for real-time PCR Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 63.6 for nested PCR 63.5 for nested PCR Possible IA cases were not included in the sensitivity and specificity determinations. Sensitivity dropped to 36.4% and specificity increased to 92.3% when only patients with at least 2 positive PCR results were considered “PCR positive.”
    Las-Flörl et al. (133) 2005 Retrospective 16 hematologic malignancy patients with proven or probable IA PCR-ELISA 108 whole-blood specimens, 9 FNA or tissue biopsy specimens, and 7 BAL fluid or tracheal secretion specimens 18S rRNA gene Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria For proven IA, 100 for FNA/tissue samples and 66 for whole blood; for probable IA, 85 for BAL fluid/tracheal secretions and 57 for whole blood NA due to study design Sensitivity of whole-blood PCR dropped to 54 and 42% for proven and probable IA, respectively, when tested during antifungal therapy. Consecutive positive PCR results were associated with fatal outcomes.
    Halliday et al. (134) 2005 Prospective 29 adults and 36 children with febrile neutropenia, undergoing intensive chemotherapy for hematologic malignancy or having received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant Nested PCR followed by ethidium bromide staining 998 whole-blood samples from 95 episodes of febrile neutropenia 18S rRNA gene Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria; proven and probable cases were considered true-positive cases, cases with no evidence of IA were considered true-negative cases, and possible cases were examined differently 100 for methods A and B, 70.6 for method C, 100 for method D 75.4 for methods A and B, 75.4 for method C, 74.7 for method D At least two positive PCR results were required for a case to be considered PCR positive. Positive PCR was the earliest indicator of IA, by a mean of 14 days. Antifungal therapy did not affect positive PCR results.
    Scotter and Chambers (132) 2005 Retrospective 25 patients with hematologic malignancies PCR-ELISA Blood Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 100 85 Possible IA cases were considered truly negative. GM assay of the same samples resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 60 and 95%, respectively.
    Florent et al. (135) 2006 Prospective 201 patients with hematologic malignancies PCR-ELISA Serum Mitochondrial DNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria For proven cases, 100; for probable cases, 58.6–86.2*; for possible cases, 27.8–72.2 87.3–89.7 for consecutive positive results, 51.5–55.2 for single positive results Combined use of PCR-ELISA and galactomannan assay increased the sensitivity to 83.3%
    Hummel et al. (136) 2006 Retrospective 6 patients with hematologic malignancies and probable, proven, or possible IA Nested PCR 35 CSF samples 18S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria Each patient had at least one positive CSF sample NA
    Badiee et al. (137) 2008 Prospective 194 patients with hematologic malignancies PCR-ELISA Whole blood rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 66 for proven and probable IA 96
    Shahid et al. (138) 2008 Retrospective 69 patients with bronchogenic carcinoma and 18 healthy controls Traditional PCR with ethidium bromide staining BAL fluid Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 100 for proven and probable IA cases 97 for non-IA cases, 100 for healthy controls
    Hummel et al. (139) 2009 Prospective 71 pediatric and adolescent immunocompromised patients Nested PCR followed by ethidium bromide staining Various 18S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 80 for proven/probable IA, 32.4 for possible IA 81 (drops to 71 if cases with possible IA are considered truly negative) Only 5 patients had proven/probable IA. Results were pooled for all different specimens tested. Patients with at least one positive PCR result were considered PCR positive
    Lopes Da Silva et al. (140) 2010 Prospective 172 patients who received high-dose chemotherapy Traditional PCR followed by ethidium bromide staining Serum and BAL fluid 18S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 75 (only proven and probable IA patients were considered truly positive) 91.9 The sensitivity and specificity of serum galactomannan assay were also tested (87.5% and 93%, respectively). The reported sensitivity and specificity refer to serum PCR. BAL fluid PCR was more sensitive (exact sensitivity not reported)
    Hummel et al. (141) 2010 Prospective 91 patients within the AmBiLoad trial Nested PCR followed by ethidium bromide staining 454 blood samples (not specified), 3 BAL fluid samples, 1 bronchial aspirate, 1 muscle biopsy specimen 18S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 43 for proven IA, 39 for probable IA NA due to study design Low sensitivity might be explained by the fact that all samples were received during antifungal treatment. Positive PCR results were associated with worse outcomes.
    Badiee et al. (142) 2012 Prospective 62 pediatric patients at increased risk for IA Nested PCR followed by ethidium bromide staining Serum Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 80 96.2 Possible IA cases were excluded from the analysis.
    Reinwald et al. (143) 2012 Retrospective 226 patients with hematologic malignancies Nested PCR followed by ethidium bromide staining BAL fluid 18S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG 58 for proven/probable IA 87 (possible IA cases were considered truly negative) Sensitivity dropped to 17% in considering only patients who were receiving at least two antifungals. Treatment with one antifungal agent during BAL sampling did not affect the PCR performance.
    Reinwald et al. (144) 2012 Prospective 87 patients at high risk for IA Nested PCR followed by ethidium bromide staining BAL fluid 18S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 59 87 (possible IA cases were considered truly negative) For comparison, the sensitivity and specificity of BAL fluid GM testing on the same samples were 79% and 96%, respectively.
    Buess et al. (145) 2012 Prospective 191 immunocompromised patients undergoing bronchoscopy for suspected pulmonary infection Nested PCR followed by ethidium bromide staining and sequencing BAL fluid 18S rRNA and 5.8S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 0 for proven IA, 50 for probable IA, 24 for possible IA 70 when only no-IA patients were considered truly negative Only 3 patients had proven IA, and 8 had probable IA.
    Reinwald et al. (9) 2013 Prospective 55 immunocompromised patients for whom central nervous system aspergillosis was suspected Nested PCR followed by ethidium bromide staining CSF 18S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 100 for proven and probable IA 93 Possible IA cases were excluded from the analysis.
Real-time PCR studies
    Costa et al. (146) 2002 Retrospective 20 patients with hematologic malignancies who had proven or probable IA Real-time PCR with fluorescein-labeled probes Serum Mitochondrial DNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 70 NA Plasma and white blood cell pellets were also tested by qPCR for some of the patients, yielding the same results as those obtained with the serum fraction. No frank increase in the DNA load during the course of disease was observed.
    Spiess et al. (147) 2003 Retrospective 18 patients with hematologic malignancies with positive nested PCR results for Aspergillus and 50 healthy controls Real-time PCR with fluorescein-labeled probes BAL fluid and whole blood Mitochondrial cytochrome b DNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 100 for BAL fluid, 43 for blood 100 Only samples that tested positive with a previously validated nested PCR test were included in the study.
    Sanguinetti et al. (148) 2003 Prospective 44 patients undergoing bronchoscopy for suspicious pulmonary infiltrates Real-time PCR with fluorescein-labeled probe BAL fluid 18S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 90 for proven and probable IA 100 (possible IA cases were considered truly negative) Galactomannan testing of the same BAL fluid samples proved to have 100% sensitivity. Nested PCR testing of the same samples also had 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity.
    Rantakokko-Jalava et al. (149) 2003 Retrospective 66 patients at risk for IA and 33 immunocompetent controls Real-time PCR with fluorescein-labeled probes BAL fluid Mitochondrial tRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 86 for proven IA, 50 for probable IA, 80 for possible IA 93 Due to the primer and probe design, the assay only detected A. fumigatus infection.
    Challier et al. (150) 2004 Retrospective 41 immunocompromised patients at risk for IA and 29 controls Real-time PCR with fluorescein-labeled probe Serum 28S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 100 for proven cases, 78.9 for probable cases All controls had negative qPCR results ELISA galactomannan testing of the same samples showed 75.2% sensitivity for proven and probable IA. The combination of galactomannan assay and qPCR testing yielded a 100% sensitivity for proven and probable IA.
    Kawazu et al. (52) 2004 Prospective 96 patients at risk for IA Real-time PCR with fluorescein-labeled probes Plasma 18S rRNA gene Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 55 93 The cutoff for positive PCR was selected to achieve a 93% specificity. Possible IA cases were considered truly positive. Galactomannan ELISA achieved a sensitivity of 100% at a cutoff value that had the same specificity.
    Musher et al. (72) 2004 Retrospective 99 patients (49 cases of IA and 50 controls) Real-time PCR with fluorescein-labeled probe BAL fluid 18S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 67 100 The sensitivity and specificity of the BAL fluid galactomannan assay for the same patients were 76% and 94%, respectively, with a cutoff of 0.5. The probe for the PCR assay was designed to detect most Aspergillus species as well as Penicillium species.
    Millon et al. (151) 2005 Retrospective 29 patients with at least one positive galactomannan test Real-time PCR with fluorescein-labeled probes Serum Mitochondrial DNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 57.1 63.6 Possible IA cases were disregarded. A PCR-positive result after the first GM-positive result was associated with a poor prognosis.
    White et al. (152) 2006 Prospective 203 patients at risk for IFI Real-time nested PCR with hydrolysis (TaqMan) probes Whole blood 28S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 92.3 94.6 Possible IA cases were disregarded. Only patients with serial positive PCR results were considered “PCR positive.”
    Cesaro et al. (153) 2008 Prospective 62 pediatric patients at risk for IA Real-time PCR with fluorescent probes Whole blood 18S rRNA gene Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 88 37 When two PCR-positive results were required for a case to be considered PCR positive, the sensitivity and specificity changed to 63% and 81%, respectively.
    Botterel et al. (154) 2008 Retrospective 25 patients with at least 1 GM-positive serum sample Real-time PCR with fluorescent probes Serum Mitochondrial DNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 61.5 for probable and possible IA cases 100 Possible IA cases were considered true-positive cases and were PCR positive. Sensitivity decreases to 54.5% if only probable cases are considered.
    Suarez et al. (155) 2008 Prospective 124 patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing chemotherapy or HSCT Real-time PCR with fluorescent probes Serum 28S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 100 when using large serum volumes for DNA extraction, 76.5 when using small serum volumes for DNA extraction 96.7 Two possible IA cases were considered truly positive. For comparison, GM test results for the same samples showed a sensitivity and specificity of 88.2% and 95.8%, respectively.
    Khot et al. (156) 2008 Retrospective 81 patients with pneumonia Real-time PCR with fluorescein-labeled probes BAL fluid 18S rDNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 77 88
    Ramirez et al. (157) 2009 Prospective 127 patients at risk for IA Real-time PCR with fluorescein-labeled probes; species were determined by melting curve analysis Whole blood 18S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 100 for proven cases, 0 for probable cases 100 if possible IA cases are disregarded. Only 1% of the 948 tested samples were PCR positive.
    Frealle et al. (158) 2009 Retrospective 57 patients at risk for IA Real-time PCR with fluorescein-labeled probes BAL fluid Mitochondrial DNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 50 for proven and probable IA cases 100
    Cuenca-Estrella et al. (159) 2009 Prospective 83 patients with febrile neutropenia Real-time PCR with hydrolysis probe 1,122 whole-blood samples and 1,122 serum samples ITS1 Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 91.6 94.4 Cases with two consecutive positive PCR results were considered PCR positive. Combined with GM assay, the sensitivity increased to 100%. Possible IA cases were considered truly positive.
    Springer et al. (10) 2011 Prospective 46 patients receiving either allogeneic SCT or myeloablative chemotherapy Real-time PCR with fluorescein-labeled probes Whole blood Multicopy ribosomal operon region from ITS1 to 5.8S region Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 55 for probable and possible IA (dropped to 27 when having more than one positive PCR result was considered “PCR positive”) 75 (increased to 100 when having more than one positive PCR result was considered “PCR positive”) Possible IA cases were considered truly positive. Selective pathogen DNA enrichment using affinity purification unexpectedly caused a decrease in the sensitivity of the assay.
    Millon et al. (160) 2011 Retrospective 44 patients with two sequential positive serum galactomannan results and a risk factor for IA Two different real-time PCR assays with hybridization probes Serum Assay 1, mitochondrial DNA; assay 2, 18S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria For assay 1, 57.7; for assay 2, 50 (dropped to 53.8 and 46.2, respectively, when at least two positive results were needed for a PCR-positive outcome) For assay 1, 94.4; for assay 2, 66.7 (increased to 100 for both when at least two positive results were needed for a PCR-positive outcome) Due to the study design, no possible IA cases were included. The combination of the ribosomal and mitochondrial PCRs increased the sensitivity of IA diagnosis to 65.4%. Positive ribosomal PCR results were associated with a poor prognosis.
    White et al. (161) 2011 Retrospective 31 patients (10 with proven/probable IA and 21 with no IA) Two different real-time PCR assays with fluorescently labeled probes Serum Assay 1, 28S rRNA; assay 2, 18S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria For assay 1, 80; for assay 2, 70 (dropped to 50 and 60, respectively, when at least two positive results were needed for a PCR-positive outcome) For assay 1, 100; for assay 2, 90.5 (both reached 100 when at least two positive results were needed for a PCR-positive outcome) Assay 2 is a commercially available PCR assay for the diagnosis of IA.
    Bernal-Martinez et al. (162) 2011 Retrospective 38 adult patients with a high clinical suspicion of IA Real-time PCR with fluorescently labeled probes Serum and whole blood ITS1 Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 100 for serum and 94.4 for blood for proven/probable IA NA The aim of the study was to compare the sensitivities of the same PCR on serum and blood specimens. The results show that both specimens achieve similar sensitivities. One positive PCR result was necessary to classify a patient as PCR positive.
    Luong et al. (163) 2011 Retrospective 137 lung transplant recipients Real-time PCR with fluorescently labeled probes BAL fluid Not specified Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 100 for proven/probable IA 88 For comparison, GM testing of the same BAL fluid samples resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 89%, respectively, at a cutoff of 0.5
    Torelli et al. (164) 2011 Prospective 158 patients from hematology and intensive care units Real-time PCR with fluorescently labeled probes BAL fluid 18S rRNA gene Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 94.1 for proven and probable IA 98.6
    Springer et al. (165) 2013 Retrospective, multicenter 47 patients with proven/probable IA and 31 controls Various real-time PCR assays Serum and whole blood Various Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 85.1 for whole blood, 78.7 for serum (dropped to 46.8 and 51.1, respectively, when two positive PCR results were needed to consider a case “PCR positive”) 64.5 for blood, 83.9 for serum (increased to 93.5 and 100, respectively, when two positive PCR results were needed to consider a case “PCR positive”) Overall, no significant difference between the performances of the PCR assays on serum versus whole-blood specimens was found.
    Rogers et al. (166) 2013 Prospective 278 patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy or HSCT Two different real-time PCR assays (a nested and a single run assay) Whole blood 28S rRNA (nested assay), ITS (single-run assay) Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 69–87 for nested assay and 55–80 for single-run PCR assay 36–63 for nested assay and 57–84 for single-run assay Possible IA cases were excluded from the analysis. Two centers were involved in the study, and the results were different between them, as evidenced by the ranges of sensitivity and specificity values.
    Li et al. (167) 2013 Prospective 72 patients with hematologic malignancies and suffering from fever, 4 with normal temperatures, and 10 healthy volunteers Real-time PCR with hydrolysis probes Whole blood and plasma 28S-ITS2 rRNA genes Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 90.9 for proven and probable IA 73.4 Possible IA cases were considered truly negative.
    Guinea et al. (168) 2013 Prospective 175 patients with hematologic malignancies and at risk for IA Real-time PCR with fluorescent probes Lower respiratory tract samples 18S rRNA Comparison to EORTC/MSG criteria 93.3 82.9 No proven IA cases were included.
a

BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; EORTC/MSG: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group; FNA, fine-needle aspiration; GM, galactomannan; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplant; IA, invasive aspergillosis; ITS, internal transcriber spacer; qPCR, quantitative PCR; NA, not applicable.